Paper · 1988 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Growth, Development, and Yield Potential of Short-internode Muskmelon

Dean E. Knavel

15
claims
45
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences. Vines of both plant types were divided into leaves, petioles, and stems at 58, 72, and 86 days of age. Leaf dry weight and leaf area were generally the same for both plant types early in growth. NI plants had greater leaf and stem dry weights and leaf area at 72 days; however, only stem dry weights differed at 86 days. The leaf : stem and leaf area : leaf dry weight ratios were always greater for SI than for NI plants, but NI plants produced twice the number and weight of fruit as SI plants. Mean fruit weight for SI plants was slightly smaller than fruits of NI plants. Doubling the population of SI plants by either spacing plants 0.45 m within the row or planting two per hill reduced fruit number and total fruit weight per plant. Highest total fruit weight was obtained by spacing SI plants 0.90 m apart in a triangular fashion within double rows spaced 0.30 m apart on a mulch row. SI plants contained less K and more Mg in leaves and less N and Ca but more K in stems than NI plants. Both plant types had similar Mg levels in stems at each sampling. There were significant year effects and internode type × year interactions for fruit number, fruit weight, and elemental concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight and leaf area were generally the same for short-internode and normal-internode muskmelon early in growth

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
short-internode (SI) muskmelon linee1
Outcome
Leaf dry weight and leaf areae2
Direction
the samee2
Qualifier
early in growthe2
Comparator
normal-internode (NI) cultivare1
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf dry weight and leaf area were generally the same for both plant types early in growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–341 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal-internode plants had greater leaf and stem dry weights and leaf area than short-internode plants at 72 days

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
NI plantse3
Outcome
leaf and stem dry weights and leaf areae3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
at 72 dayse3
Comparator
short-internode (SI) muskmelon linee1
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“NI plants had greater leaf and stem dry weights and leaf area at 72 days; however, only stem dry weights differed at 86 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem dry weight of normal-internode plants differed from short-internode plants at 86 days

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
NI plantse3
Outcome
stem dry weightse3
Qualifier
at 86 dayse3
Comparator
short-internode (SI) muskmelon linee1
Setting
four seasonse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e3

“NI plants had greater leaf and stem dry weights and leaf area at 72 days; however, only stem dry weights differed at 86 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–467 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf:stem and leaf area:leaf dry weight ratios were always greater in short-internode than normal-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SIe4
Outcome
leaf : stem and leaf area : leaf dry weight ratiose4
Direction
greatere4
Qualifier
alwayse4
Comparator
NI plantse4
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e4

“The leaf : stem and leaf area : leaf dry weight ratios were always greater for SI than for NI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–569 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal-internode plants produced twice the number and weight of fruit of short-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
NI plantse5
Outcome
number and weight of fruite5
Direction
producede5
Value
twicee5
Comparator
SI plantse5
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e5

“NI plants produced twice the number and weight of fruit as SI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–643 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean fruit weight of short-internode plants was slightly smaller than that of normal-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse6
Outcome
Mean fruit weighte6
Direction
smallere6
Qualifier
slightlye6
Comparator
NI plantse6
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e6

“Mean fruit weight for SI plants was slightly smaller than fruits of NI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling the population of short-internode plants by spacing or two plants per hill reduced fruit number and total fruit weight per plant

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse7
Treatment
Doubling the population of SI plants by either spacing plants 0.45 m within the row or planting two per hille7
Outcome
fruit number and total fruit weight per plante7
Direction
reducede7
Setting
four seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e7

“Doubling the population of SI plants by either spacing plants 0.45 m within the row or planting two per hill reduced fruit number and total fruit weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing short-internode plants 0.90 m apart in a triangular fashion within double rows gave the highest total fruit weight

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse2
Treatment
spacing SI plants 0.90 m apart in a triangular fashion within double rows spaced 0.30 m apart on a mulch rowe2
Outcome
total fruit weighte2
Direction
Higheste2
Setting
four seasonse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“Highest total fruit weight was obtained by spacing SI plants 0.90 m apart in a triangular fashion within double rows spaced 0.30 m apart on a mulch row”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1039 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-internode plants contained less K in leaves than normal-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse2
Outcome
Ke2
Direction
lesse2
Qualifier
in leavese2
Comparator
NI plantse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“SI plants contained less K and more Mg in leaves and less N and Ca but more K in stems than NI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-internode plants contained more Mg in leaves than normal-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse2
Outcome
Mge2
Direction
moree2
Qualifier
in leavese2
Comparator
NI plantse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“SI plants contained less K and more Mg in leaves and less N and Ca but more K in stems than NI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-internode plants contained less N and Ca in leaves than normal-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse2
Outcome
N and Cae2
Direction
lesse2
Qualifier
in leavese2
Comparator
NI plantse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“SI plants contained less K and more Mg in leaves and less N and Ca but more K in stems than NI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-internode plants contained more K in stems than normal-internode plants

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse2
Outcome
Ke2
Direction
moree2
Qualifier
in stemse2
Comparator
NI plantse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“SI plants contained less K and more Mg in leaves and less N and Ca but more K in stems than NI plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1142 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both muskmelon plant types had similar Mg levels in stems at each sampling

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
Both plant typese2
Outcome
Mg levelse2
Direction
similare2
Qualifier
in stemse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both plant types had similar Mg levels in stems at each sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Year had significant effects on fruit number, fruit weight and elemental concentrations

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
fruit number, fruit weight, and elemental concentrationse2
Qualifier
significant year effectse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were significant year effects and internode type × year interactions for fruit number, fruit weight, and elemental concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1345 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Internode type by year interactions were significant for fruit number, fruit weight and elemental concentrations

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
internode typee2
Outcome
fruit number, fruit weight, and elemental concentrationse2
Qualifier
internode type × year interactionse2
Setting
four seasonse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Short-internode Muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“A short-internode (SI) muskmelon line was compared with a normal-internode (NI) cultivar in four seasons for growth and yield differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–146 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were significant year effects and internode type × year interactions for fruit number, fruit weight, and elemental concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1345 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 37 positive, 7 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.