Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

A LOW INPUT STRATEGY FOR SCAB CONTROL IN ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION

L. Jamar; B. Pahaut; M. Lateur

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effectiveness of compounds such as sulphur, lime sulphur, copper and potassium bicarbonate for controlling primary scab was investigated in field experiments over two growing seasons in Belgium on high and medium scabsusceptible cultivars, 'Pinova' and 'Pirouette', respectively, and two Vf scabresistant cultivars, 'Initial' and 'Topaz'. With the aim of reducing the amount of fungicide to be applied, two strategies were evaluated: (i) timing fungicide applications so that spraying occurred during the infection process, as determined by the RIMpro software warning system and (ii) using a tunnel sprayer machine for treatment applications. In both years of the study, although there was high disease pressure, low rates of elemental sulphur (<40 kg ha-1 year-1), combined with low rates of copper (<3 kg ha-1 year-1) provided the best scab control and reduced scab severity on the fruit of 'Pinova' by ≥97% compared with a water control. Lime sulphur was more effective than wettable sulphur and appeared to be effective at temperatures below 10°C. Potassium bicarbonate significantly reduced apple scab and was, in some cases, as effective as wettable sulphur, using the same dosage. All treatments increased the yield of the scab-susceptible cultivars as well as that of the scabresistant cultivars. Under these conditions, none of the treatments caused phytotoxicity, increased fruit russet, affected the summer density of the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri or resulted in undesirable residues on fruit at harvest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rates of elemental sulphur combined with low rates of copper gave the best scab control and reduced scab severity on Pinova fruit by 97% or more compared with a water control.

Material
Pinovae1
Treatment
low rates of elemental sulphur (<40 kg ha-1 year-1), combined with low rates of copper (<3 kg ha-1 year-1)e1
Outcome
scab severitye1
Direction
reducede1
Value
≥97%e1
Comparator
a water controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“low rates of elemental sulphur (<40 kg ha-1 year-1), combined with low rates of copper (<3 kg ha-1 year-1) provided the best scab control and reduced scab severity on the fruit of 'Pinova' by ≥97% compared with a water control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime sulphur was more effective than wettable sulphur.

Treatment
Lime sulphure2
Outcome
effectivee2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
wettable sulphure2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lime sulphur was more effective than wettable sulphur and appeared to be effective at temperatures below 10°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime sulphur appeared to be effective at temperatures below 10°C.

Treatment
Lime sulphure2
Outcome
effectivee2
Qualifier
temperatures below 10°Ce2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e2

“Lime sulphur was more effective than wettable sulphur and appeared to be effective at temperatures below 10°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium bicarbonate significantly reduced apple scab.

Treatment
Potassium bicarbonatee3
Outcome
apple scabe3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Potassium bicarbonate significantly reduced apple scab and was, in some cases, as effective as wettable sulphur, using the same dosage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium bicarbonate was, in some cases, as effective as wettable sulphur at the same dosage.

Treatment
Potassium bicarbonatee3
Outcome
effectivee3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
in some casese3
Comparator
wettable sulphure3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e3

“Potassium bicarbonate significantly reduced apple scab and was, in some cases, as effective as wettable sulphur, using the same dosage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased the yield of the scab-susceptible cultivars.

Material
scab-susceptible cultivarse4
Treatment
All treatmentse4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“All treatments increased the yield of the scab-susceptible cultivars as well as that of the scabresistant cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased the yield of the scabresistant cultivars.

Material
scabresistant cultivarse4
Treatment
All treatmentse4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e4

“All treatments increased the yield of the scab-susceptible cultivars as well as that of the scabresistant cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatments caused phytotoxicity.

Treatment
treatmentse5
Outcome
phytotoxicitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under these conditions, none of the treatments caused phytotoxicity, increased fruit russet, affected the summer density of the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri or resulted in undesirable residues on fruit at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatments increased fruit russet.

Treatment
treatmentse5
Outcome
fruit russete5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under these conditions, none of the treatments caused phytotoxicity, increased fruit russet, affected the summer density of the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri or resulted in undesirable residues on fruit at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatments affected the summer density of the predatory mite Typhlodromus pyri.

Treatment
treatmentse5
Interactor
Typhlodromus pyriTyphlodromus pyrie5other
Outcome
summer densitye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under these conditions, none of the treatments caused phytotoxicity, increased fruit russet, affected the summer density of the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri or resulted in undesirable residues on fruit at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1528 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the treatments resulted in undesirable residues on fruit at harvest.

Treatment
treatmentse5
Outcome
undesirable residues on fruite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“ORGANIC APPLE PRODUCTION”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–65 · show in text ↑
e5

“Under these conditions, none of the treatments caused phytotoxicity, increased fruit russet, affected the summer density of the predatory mite, Typhlodromus pyri or resulted in undesirable residues on fruit at harvest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1528 · show in text ↑

potassium hydrogencarbonate · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

copper atom · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.