Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Pre-and post-emergence herbicides for weed control in greengram and their residual effect on succeeding crops

B.D. Patel; D.D. Chaudhari; V.J. Patel; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram and their residual effect on succeeding crops was studied during Kharif season of the year 2011–2013. Inter-culturing and hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DAS produced the lowest weed dry weight with higher weed control efficiency. Among herbicidal treatments, pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram. Further, it was observed that none of the herbicides applied at tested rates had adverse effect on succeeding wheat, chickpea and mustard crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-culturing and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS produced the lowest weed dry weight in greengram.

Treatment
Inter-culturing and hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DASe1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inter-culturing and hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DAS produced the lowest weed dry weight with higher weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-culturing and hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave higher weed control efficiency in greengram.

Treatment
Inter-culturing and hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
weed control efficiencye1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inter-culturing and hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DAS produced the lowest weed dry weight with higher weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pendimethalin at 500 g/ha followed by hand weeding at 30 DAS reduced weed dry weight in greengram.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/hae2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DASe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha followed by hand weeding at 30 DAS reduced weed dry weight in greengram.

Treatment
imazethapyr 75 g/hae2
Interactor
weede2weed
Outcome
weed dry weighte2
Direction
reducinge2
Qualifier
followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DASe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pendimethalin at 500 g/ha gave more than 70% weed control efficiency in greengram.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/hae2
Outcome
weed control efficiencye2
Direction
highere2
Value
more than 70%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha gave more than 70% weed control efficiency in greengram.

Treatment
imazethapyr 75 g/hae2
Outcome
weed control efficiencye2
Direction
highere2
Value
more than 70%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pendimethalin at 500 g/ha increased seed and haulm yield of greengram.

Treatment
pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/hae2
Outcome
seed and haulm yielde2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr at 75 g/ha increased seed and haulm yield of greengram.

Treatment
imazethapyr 75 g/hae2
Outcome
seed and haulm yielde2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparative efficacy of pre- and post-emergence herbicides in greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of pendimethalin at 500 g/ha or imazethapyr 75 g/ha followed by interculturing and hand weeding at 30 DAS proved to be efficient in reducing weed dry weight with more than 70% of weed control efficiency and recorded higher seed and haulm yield of greengram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the herbicides at the tested rates had an adverse effect on succeeding wheat, chickpea and mustard crops.

Taxon
wheat, chickpea and mustarde3
Treatment
herbicides applied at tested ratese3
Outcome
adverse effecte3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e3

“none of the herbicides applied at tested rates had adverse effect on succeeding wheat, chickpea and mustard crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–765 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ

50 papers: 49 positive, 1 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

40 papers: 40 positive, 0 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

herbicide · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 103 positive, 6 negative or no effect

102 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

herbicide · weed · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

73 papers: 73 positive, 0 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.