Paper · 2015 · Scientific Reports

Plant growth improvement mediated by nitrate capture in co-composted biochar

Claudia I. Kammann; Hans-Peter Schmidt; Nicole Messerschmidt; et al.

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
528
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil amendment with pyrogenic carbon (biochar) is discussed as strategy to improve soil fertility to enable economic plus environmental benefits. In temperate soils, however, the use of pure biochar mostly has moderately-negative to -positive yield effects. Here we demonstrate that co-composting considerably promoted biochars' positive effects, largely by nitrate (nutrient) capture and delivery. In a full-factorial growth study with Chenopodium quinoa, biomass yield increased up to 305% in a sandy-poor soil amended with 2% (w/w) co-composted biochar (BC(comp)). Conversely, addition of 2% (w/w) untreated biochar (BC(pure)) decreased the biomass to 60% of the control. Growth-promoting (BC(comp)) as well as growth-reducing (BC(pure)) effects were more pronounced at lower nutrient-supply levels. Electro-ultra filtration and sequential biochar-particle washing revealed that co-composted biochar was nutrient-enriched, particularly with the anions nitrate and phosphate. The captured nitrate in BC(comp) was (1) only partly detectable with standard methods, (2) largely protected against leaching, (3) partly plant-available, and (4) did not stimulate N2O emissions. We hypothesize that surface ageing plus non-conventional ion-water bonding in micro- and nano-pores promoted nitrate capture in biochar particles. Amending (N-rich) bio-waste with biochar may enhance its agronomic value and reduce nutrient losses from bio-wastes and agricultural soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-composted biochar increased quinoa biomass yield up to 305% in sandy-poor soil.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoae0
Treatment
2% (w/w) co-composted biochare0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
305%e0
Setting
sandy-poor soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a full-factorial growth study with Chenopodium quinoa, biomass yield increased up to 305% in a sandy-poor soil amended with 2% (w/w) co-composted biochar (BC(comp)).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–567 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated biochar reduced quinoa biomass to 60% of control.

Treatment
2% (w/w) untreated biochare0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Conversely, addition of 2% (w/w) untreated biochar (BC(pure)) decreased the biomass to 60% of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–674 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both growth promoting and growth reducing biochar effects were stronger at lower nutrient supply.

Outcome
effectse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Setting
lower nutrient-supply levelse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Growth-promoting (BC(comp)) as well as growth-reducing (BC(pure)) effects were more pronounced at lower nutrient-supply levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–802 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-composted biochar was enriched with nitrate and phosphate.

Outcome
nutrient-enriched, particularly with the anions nitrate and phosphatee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“co-composted biochar was nutrient-enriched, particularly with the anions nitrate and phosphate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–977 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captured nitrate was only partly detectable with standard methods.

Outcome
captured nitratee0
Comparator
standard methodse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The captured nitrate in BC(comp) was (1) only partly detectable with standard methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1063 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captured nitrate was largely protected against leaching.

Outcome
captured nitratee0
Qualifier
largely protected against leachinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The captured nitrate in BC(comp) was (1) only partly detectable with standard methods, (2) largely protected against leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captured nitrate was partly plant available.

Outcome
partly plant-availablee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“(3) partly plant-available”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captured nitrate did not stimulate N2O emissions.

Outcome
N2O emissionse0
Direction
did not stimulatee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“(4) did not stimulate N2O emissions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1173 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adding biochar to nitrogen rich biowaste may improve agronomic value and reduce nutrient losses.

Outcome
Amending (N-rich) bio-waste with biochare0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Amending (N-rich) bio-waste with biochar may enhance its agronomic value and reduce nutrient losses from bio-wastes and agricultural soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1460 · show in text ↑

biochar · yield · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.