Paper · 2016 · Journal of Crop Protection

Short and long term effects of some bio-insecticides on Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and its coexisting generalist predators in tomato fields

Leila Nazarpour; Fatemeh Yarahmadi; Moosa Saber; et al.

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is one of the most destructive pests of tomato in many parts of the world including Iran. Field studies were conducted to determine the short and long term effects of Bacillus thuringiensis var Kurstaki (Bt), azadirachtin (AZ), a mix of AZ + Bt, and indoxacarb, as a current chemical insecticide, on T. absoluta larvae. Also, effects of the insecticides were studied on the coexisting generalist predators, Coccinella septempunctata L., Chrysoperla carnea Stephens and Syritta sp. Sampling of T. absoluta and its coexisting generalist predators were performed 1 day before treatment (DBT) and one, 5, 8, 14 and 19 days after treatment (DAT). The results indicated significant short term effect of indoxacarb on the pest larvae. Indoxacarb reduced T. absoluta density and damages. Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT and caused significant reduction in leaf, stem and fruit damage. The highest long term effect on the pest abundance and damage were observed in Az + Bt caused 100% reduction in fruit and foliage damage compared to the control. The highest and lowest adverse effects on C. carnea, C. septempunctat and Serrita sp. were observed in indoxacarb and Bt treatments, respectively. Findings of this study imply that the mixture of Az + Bt has the highest selective toxicity on the pest and the lowest effect on its coexisting generalist predators.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb reduced Tuta absoluta larval density and damage in tomato fields over the short term.

Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
T. absoluta density and damagese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“The results indicated significant short term effect of indoxacarb on the pest larvae. Indoxacarb reduced T. absoluta density and damages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt suppressed Tuta absoluta larval density at 19 days after treatment.

Treatment
Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
larval densitye0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
19 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AZ suppressed Tuta absoluta larval density at 19 days after treatment.

Treatment
AZe0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
larval densitye0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
19 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bt and AZ mixture suppressed Tuta absoluta larval density at 19 days after treatment.

Treatment
mixture of theme0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
larval densitye0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
19 DATe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt reduced tomato leaf, stem and fruit damage significantly.

Treatment
Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
leaf, stem and fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT and caused significant reduction in leaf, stem and fruit damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AZ reduced tomato leaf, stem and fruit damage significantly.

Treatment
AZe0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
leaf, stem and fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT and caused significant reduction in leaf, stem and fruit damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The Bt and AZ mixture reduced tomato leaf, stem and fruit damage significantly.

Treatment
mixture of theme0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
leaf, stem and fruit damagee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bt, AZ and mixture of them significantly suppressed the larval density at 19 DAT and caused significant reduction in leaf, stem and fruit damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–993 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The AZ and Bt mixture produced the highest long-term reduction in pest abundance and damage, including complete reduction of fruit and foliage damage versus control.

Treatment
Az + Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absoluta MeyrickTuta absolutae1pest
Outcome
fruit and foliage damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest long term effect on the pest abundance and damage were observed in Az + Bt caused 100% reduction in fruit and foliage damage compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tuta absoluta Meyrick”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 19–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb caused the highest adverse effects on the three generalist predators.

Treatment
indoxacarbe0
Interactor
C. carneaChrysoperla carneae0other
Outcome
adverse effects on C. carnea, C. septempunctat and Serrita sp.e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
Bte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest and lowest adverse effects on C. carnea, C. septempunctat and Serrita sp. were observed in indoxacarb and Bt treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt caused the lowest adverse effects on the three generalist predators.

Treatment
Bte0
Interactor
C. carneaChrysoperla carneae0other
Outcome
adverse effects on C. carnea, C. septempunctat and Serrita sp.e0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
indoxacarbe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest and lowest adverse effects on C. carnea, C. septempunctat and Serrita sp. were observed in indoxacarb and Bt treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1303 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify AZ and Bt mixture as having the highest selective toxicity against the pest and lowest effects on predators.

Treatment
Az + Bte0
Outcome
highest selective toxicity on the pest and the lowest effect on its coexisting generalist predatorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 148–161 · show in text ↑
e0

“the mixture of Az + Bt has the highest selective toxicity on the pest and the lowest effect on its coexisting generalist predators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1468 · show in text ↑

indoxacarb · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

azadirachtin · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

transgenic · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.