Paper · 2023 · Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

The effect of sublethal doses of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars

Limo Khatami; Akbar Ghassemi-Kahrizeh; Abbas Hosseinzadeh; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The effect of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Berliner on the Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on two resistant ('King Stone') and susceptible ('Rio Grande') tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivars was studied under laboratory conditions.In the bioassay tests, the lethal concentration (LC 50 ) values of Bt were determined for the 2nd-and 3rd-instar larvae of T. absoluta on two cultivars.In another experiment, the effect of sublethal doses of Bt on 2nd-and 3rd-instar larvae on two susceptible and resistant cultivars was determined.Also, the nutritional indices and the enzyme content of larvae on two susceptible and resistant cultivars under the sublethal doses of Bt were investigated.All nutritional indices and the enzyme content of the treated larvae were significantly different compared to those of the control group.The lowest efficiency of the conversion of ingested food (7.82%), the efficiency of the conversion of digested food (4.34%), the relative consumption rate (22.29 mg mg -1 day -1 ), and the relative growth rate (1.16 mg mg -1 day -1 ) was determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.The lowest amount of α-amylase (0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 protein), protease (12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 protein), and lipase (0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 protein) and the highest amount of phenoloxidase (0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 protein) were determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.The results showed that the integration of Bt application and host plant resistance significantly increased the efficiency of Bt.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt-treated Tuta absoluta larvae differed significantly from controls in nutritional indices and enzyme content.

Treatment
treated larvaee0
Outcome
nutritional indices and the enzyme contente0
Comparator
control groupe0

Not reportedTaxonInteractorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“All nutritional indices and the enzyme content of the treated larvae were significantly different compared to those of the control group.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt had the lowest efficiency of the conversion of ingested food, 7.82%.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
efficiency of the conversion of ingested foode0
Direction
loweste0
Value
7.82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest efficiency of the conversion of ingested food (7.82%), the efficiency of the conversion of digested food (4.34%), the relative consumption rate (22.29 mg mg -1 day -1 ), and the relative growth rate (1.16 mg mg -1 day -1 ) was determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt had the lowest efficiency of the conversion of digested food, 4.34%.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
efficiency of the conversion of digested foode0
Direction
loweste0
Value
4.34%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest efficiency of the conversion of ingested food (7.82%), the efficiency of the conversion of digested food (4.34%), the relative consumption rate (22.29 mg mg -1 day -1 ), and the relative growth rate (1.16 mg mg -1 day -1 ) was determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt had the lowest relative consumption rate, 22.29 mg mg -1 day -1.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
relative consumption ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
22.29 mg mg -1 day -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest efficiency of the conversion of ingested food (7.82%), the efficiency of the conversion of digested food (4.34%), the relative consumption rate (22.29 mg mg -1 day -1 ), and the relative growth rate (1.16 mg mg -1 day -1 ) was determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt had the lowest relative growth rate, 1.16 mg mg -1 day -1.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.16 mg mg -1 day -1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest efficiency of the conversion of ingested food (7.82%), the efficiency of the conversion of digested food (4.34%), the relative consumption rate (22.29 mg mg -1 day -1 ), and the relative growth rate (1.16 mg mg -1 day -1 ) was determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at LC 25 Bt had the lowest amount of α-amylase, 0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 protein.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
α-amylasee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest amount of α-amylase (0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 protein), protease (12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 protein), and lipase (0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 protein) and the highest amount of phenoloxidase (0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 protein) were determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at LC 25 Bt had the lowest amount of protease, 12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 protein.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
proteasee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest amount of α-amylase (0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 protein), protease (12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 protein), and lipase (0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 protein) and the highest amount of phenoloxidase (0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 protein) were determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at LC 25 Bt had the lowest amount of lipase, 0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 protein.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
lipasee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest amount of α-amylase (0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 protein), protease (12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 protein), and lipase (0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 protein) and the highest amount of phenoloxidase (0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 protein) were determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tuta absoluta larvae on 'King Stone' at LC 25 Bt had the highest amount of phenoloxidase, 0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 protein.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Material
'King Stone'e0
Treatment
LC 25 concentration of Bte0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
phenoloxidasee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 proteine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest amount of α-amylase (0.98 nM min -1 mg -1 protein), protease (12.61 µM min -1 mg -1 protein), and lipase (0.182 nM min -1 mg -1 protein) and the highest amount of phenoloxidase (0.337 µM min -1 mg -1 protein) were determined for the resistant cultivar 'King Stone' at the LC 25 concentration of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating Bt application with host plant resistance significantly increased Bt efficiency.

Taxon
tomato cultivarsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
integration of Bt application and host plant resistancee0
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
efficiency of Bte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the integration of Bt application and host plant resistance significantly increased the efficiency of Bt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) on resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–137 · show in text ↑

transgenic · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.