Paper · 2015 · Scientific Reports

Productivity and sustainability of rainfed wheat-soybean system in the North China Plain: results from a long-term experiment and crop modelling

Wei Qin; Daozhong Wang; Xisheng Guo; et al.

15
claims
26
verbatim quotes
78
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A quantitative understanding of yield response to water and nutrients is key to improving the productivity and sustainability of rainfed cropping systems. Here, we quantified the effects of rainfall, fertilization (NPK) and soil organic amendments (with straw and manure) on yields of a rainfed wheat-soybean system in the North China Plain (NCP), using 30-years' field experimental data (1982-2012) and the simulation model-AquaCrop. On average, wheat and soybean yields were 5 and 2.5 times higher in the fertilized treatments than in the unfertilized control (CK), respectively. Yields of fertilized treatments increased and yields of CK decreased over time. NPK + manure increased yields more than NPK alone or NPK + straw. The additional effect of manure is likely due to increased availability of K and micronutrients. Wheat yields were limited by rainfall and can be increased through soil mulching (15%) or irrigation (35%). In conclusion, combined applications of fertilizer NPK and manure were more effective in sustaining high crop yields than recommended fertilizer NPK applications. Manure applications led to strong accumulation of NPK and relatively low NPK use efficiencies. Water deficiency in wheat increased over time due to the steady increase in yields, suggesting that the need for soil mulching increases.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized wheat yield averaged five times unfertilized control yield.

Treatment
fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
5e0
Comparator
unfertilized control (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, wheat and soybean yields were 5 and 2.5 times higher in the fertilized treatments than in the unfertilized control (CK), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized soybean yield averaged 2.5 times unfertilized control yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.5e0
Comparator
unfertilized control (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, wheat and soybean yields were 5 and 2.5 times higher in the fertilized treatments than in the unfertilized control (CK), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–581 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yields under fertilization increased over time.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
fertilized treatmentse0
Outcome
Yields of fertilized treatmentse0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of fertilized treatments increased and yields of CK decreased over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unfertilized control yields decreased over time.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
CKe0
Outcome
yields of CKe0
Direction
decreasede0

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of fertilized treatments increased and yields of CK decreased over time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–661 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus manure increased yield more than NPK alone.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
NPK + manuree0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“NPK + manure increased yields more than NPK alone or NPK + straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus manure increased yield more than NPK plus straw.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
NPK + manuree0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NPK + strawe0

Verbatim

e0

“NPK + manure increased yields more than NPK alone or NPK + straw.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–727 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the additional manure yield effect to K and micronutrient availability.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
manuree0
Outcome
additional effect of manuree0
Qualifier
increased availability of K and micronutrientse0

Verbatim

e0

“The additional effect of manure is likely due to increased availability of K and micronutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfall limited wheat yield.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
limitede0
Setting
North China Plaint0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were limited by rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Soil mulching could increase wheat yield by 15%.

Treatment
soil mulchinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were limited by rainfall and can be increased through soil mulching (15%) or irrigation (35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation could increase wheat yield by 35%.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yields were limited by rainfall and can be increased through soil mulching (15%) or irrigation (35%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–932 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined NPK and manure sustained high yields more effectively than recommended NPK.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
combined applications of fertilizer NPK and manuree0
Outcome
high crop yieldse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
recommended fertilizer NPK applicationse0

Verbatim

e0

“combined applications of fertilizer NPK and manure were more effective in sustaining high crop yields than recommended fertilizer NPK applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure led to strong NPK accumulation.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
Manure applicationse0
Outcome
accumulation of NPKe0
Direction
strong accumulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Manure applications led to strong accumulation of NPK and relatively low NPK use efficiencies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure led to relatively low NPK use efficiency.

Taxon
wheat-soybeant0
Treatment
Manure applicationse0
Outcome
NPK use efficienciese0
Direction
relatively lowe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Manure applications led to strong accumulation of NPK and relatively low NPK use efficiencies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat water deficiency increased over time as yields rose.

Outcome
Water deficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
steady increase in yieldse0
Setting
North China Plaint0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficiency in wheat increased over time due to the steady increase in yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest increasing the use of soil mulching as water deficiency grows.

Outcome
need for soil mulchinge0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that the need for soil mulching increases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat-soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–56 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 137 positive, 12 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.