Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Combining fertigation and consortium of bio-fertilizers for enhancing growth and yield of banana cv. Robusta (AAA)

M. Senthilkumar; S. Ganesh; K. Srinivas; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out to study the effects of combination of fertigation and consortium of bio-fertilizers in enhancing the production of banana cv. Robusta (AAA) and improving the soil biological properties. The results shown that, fertigation with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and 300 g of consortium of bio-fertilizers (CBF) produced significantly higher yield (115 MT ha−1) as compared to other treatments in the main crop. The yield increase was nearly 32 per cent as compared to soil application of fertilizers (78 MT ha−1). However, the yield difference between 100 and 75% RDF with CBF was not significant. Moreover, there was no significant yield difference between 75 and 50% RDF. In the ratoon crop, fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBF produced significantly higher yield (109 MT ha−1), which was 30 per cent higher as compared to soil application of fertilizers (76 MT ha−1) and 42 per cent higher than the treatment comprising of farm yard manure (FYM) + 300 g of CBF. In the ratoon crop, the yield difference between 100 and 75% RDF with CBF was not significant. Similarly, yield difference between 75 and 50% RDF was not significant. In both the cropping seasons, the soil biological activity in terms microbial population of was enhanced at higher level of consortium of bio-fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the main crop, 100% RDF fertigation plus 300 g CBF yielded 115 MT ha−1, significantly above other treatments.

Taxon
bananae1
Material
Robusta (AAA)e1
Treatment
fertigation with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and 300 g of consortium of bio-fertilizers (CBF)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
115 MT ha−1e0
Qualifier
in the main crope0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“fertigation with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and 300 g of consortium of bio-fertilizers (CBF) produced significantly higher yield (115 MT ha−1) as compared to other treatments in the main crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–461 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main crop yield was nearly 32 percent higher than with soil fertilizer application.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
fertigation with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and 300 g of consortium of bio-fertilizers (CBF)e1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
nearly 32 per cente0
Qualifier
78 MT ha−1e0
Comparator
soil application of fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“The yield increase was nearly 32 per cent as compared to soil application of fertilizers (78 MT ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–564 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation with 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) and 300 g of consortium of bio-fertilizers (CBF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–361 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Main crop yields did not significantly differ between 100% and 75% RDF with CBF.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
100e0
Outcome
yield differencee0
Direction
not significante0
Comparator
75% RDF with CBFe0

Verbatim

e0

“However, the yield difference between 100 and 75% RDF with CBF was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–648 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Main crop yields did not significantly differ between 75% and 50% RDF.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
75e0
Outcome
yield differencee0
Direction
no significante0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant yield difference between 75 and 50% RDF.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–724 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the ratoon crop, 100% RDF fertigation plus 100 g CBF yielded 109 MT ha−1, significantly above comparators.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBFe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
109 MT ha−1e0
Qualifier
In the ratoon crope0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the ratoon crop, fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBF produced significantly higher yield (109 MT ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–837 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon yield was 30 percent higher than soil fertilizer application.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBFe1
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere0
Value
30 per cente0
Qualifier
76 MT ha−1e0
Comparator
soil application of fertilizerse0

Verbatim

e0

“which was 30 per cent higher as compared to soil application of fertilizers (76 MT ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–927 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–787 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“produced significantly higher yield (109 MT ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon yield was 42 percent higher than FYM plus 300 g CBF.

Taxon
bananae2
Treatment
fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBFe1
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highere0
Value
42 per cente0
Comparator
farm yard manure (FYM) + 300 g of CBFe0

Verbatim

e0

“42 per cent higher than the treatment comprising of farm yard manure (FYM) + 300 g of CBF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1021 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertigation with 100% RDF and 100 g of CBF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–787 · show in text ↑
e2

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“produced significantly higher yield (109 MT ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon yields did not significantly differ between 100% and 75% RDF with CBF.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
100e0
Outcome
yield differencee0
Direction
not significante0
Comparator
75% RDF with CBFe0

Verbatim

e0

“In the ratoon crop, the yield difference between 100 and 75% RDF with CBF was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ratoon yields did not significantly differ between 75% and 50% RDF.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
75e0
Outcome
yield differencee0
Direction
not significante0
Comparator
50% RDFe0

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, yield difference between 75 and 50% RDF was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher bio-fertilizer consortium levels enhanced soil microbial populations in both seasons.

Taxon
bananae1
Treatment
higher level of consortium of bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
soil biological activity in terms microbial populatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
both the cropping seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In both the cropping seasons, the soil biological activity in terms microbial population of was enhanced at higher level of consortium of bio-fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“banana cv. Robusta (AAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–182 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · yield · MusaPositive and negative results

128 papers: 118 positive, 10 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.