Abstract
To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design and replicated four times. Five varieties of mungbean viz., Pusa 105, Ganga 1, ML 682, PMB 14 and Pant Mung 4 were sown normal and late. Data on growth, development and yield components were recorded from ten randomly selected plants from each plots. Grain and straw yield were taken from the net harvested plot and computed to get kg ha(-1). Among the varieties, PMB 14 ranked first in terms of grain yield (549 kg ha(-1)) followed by Ganga 1 (521kg ha(-1)), ML 682(495 kg ha(-1)), Pant Mung 4 (475 kg ha(-1)) and Pusa 105 (438 kg ha(-1)). Highest grain yield (516 kg ha(-1)) was obtained in case of normal sowing whereas comparably lower yield (476 kg ha(-1)) was recorded under late sown condition. Significant interaction was noticed only in case of pods per plant. To obtain higher grain yield, mungbean should be sown at normal time (1st week of August) with genotype PMB 14.Most consistent performer under normal and delayed sowing was ML682. Pant Mung 4 was found to be most sensitive in delay planting than other tested varieties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Variety PMB 14 ranked first in grain yield among the five mungbean varieties (549 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- PMB 14e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 549 kg ha(-1)e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e0“To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design”
e1“Among the varieties, PMB 14 ranked first in terms of grain yield (549 kg ha(-1)) followed by Ganga 1 (521kg ha(-1)), ML 682(495 kg ha(-1)), Pant Mung 4 (475 kg ha(-1)) and Pusa 105 (438 kg ha(-1))”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety Ganga 1 ranked second in grain yield among the five mungbean varieties (521 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- Ganga 1e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 521kg ha(-1)e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e0“To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design”
e1“Among the varieties, PMB 14 ranked first in terms of grain yield (549 kg ha(-1)) followed by Ganga 1 (521kg ha(-1)), ML 682(495 kg ha(-1)), Pant Mung 4 (475 kg ha(-1)) and Pusa 105 (438 kg ha(-1))”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety ML 682 had grain yield of 495 kg/ha among the five mungbean varieties.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- ML 682e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 495 kg ha(-1)e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e0“To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design”
e1“Among the varieties, PMB 14 ranked first in terms of grain yield (549 kg ha(-1)) followed by Ganga 1 (521kg ha(-1)), ML 682(495 kg ha(-1)), Pant Mung 4 (475 kg ha(-1)) and Pusa 105 (438 kg ha(-1))”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety Pant Mung 4 had grain yield of 475 kg/ha among the five mungbean varieties.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- Pant Mung 4e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 475 kg ha(-1)e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e0“To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design”
e1“Among the varieties, PMB 14 ranked first in terms of grain yield (549 kg ha(-1)) followed by Ganga 1 (521kg ha(-1)), ML 682(495 kg ha(-1)), Pant Mung 4 (475 kg ha(-1)) and Pusa 105 (438 kg ha(-1))”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety Pusa 105 had the lowest grain yield (438 kg/ha) among the five mungbean varieties.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- Pusa 105e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Value
- 438 kg ha(-1)e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e0“To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design”
e1“Among the varieties, PMB 14 ranked first in terms of grain yield (549 kg ha(-1)) followed by Ganga 1 (521kg ha(-1)), ML 682(495 kg ha(-1)), Pant Mung 4 (475 kg ha(-1)) and Pusa 105 (438 kg ha(-1))”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal sowing gave higher grain yield (516 kg/ha) than late sowing (476 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- normal sowinge3
- Outcome
- grain yielde3
- Direction
- Higheste3
- Value
- 516 kg ha(-1)e3
- Qualifier
- 476 kg ha(-1)e3
- Comparator
- late sown conditione3
- Setting
- field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e0“To get maximum yield of kharif mungbean, a field experiment was conducted in a split plot design”
e3“Highest grain yield (516 kg ha(-1)) was obtained in case of normal sowing whereas comparably lower yield (476 kg ha(-1)) was recorded under late sown condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety by sowing-time interaction was significant only for pods per plant.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- sown normal and latee2
- Outcome
- pods per plante4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e2“Five varieties of mungbean viz., Pusa 105, Ganga 1, ML 682, PMB 14 and Pant Mung 4 were sown normal and late”
e4“Significant interaction was noticed only in case of pods per plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety ML682 was the most consistent performer under normal and delayed sowing.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- ML682e6
- Outcome
- consistent performere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e6“Most consistent performer under normal and delayed sowing was ML682”
Claim · model-written summary
Variety Pant Mung 4 was more sensitive to delayed planting than the other tested varieties.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- Pant Mung 4e7
- Treatment
- delay plantinge7
- Outcome
- sensitivee7
- Direction
- higherinferrede7
- Comparator
- other tested varietiese7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e7“Pant Mung 4 was found to be most sensitive in delay planting than other tested varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
To obtain higher grain yield, mungbean should be sown at normal time (1st week of August) with genotype PMB 14.
- Taxon
- mungbean
Vigna radiatat0 - Material
- PMB 14e5
- Outcome
- sown at normal timee5
- Qualifier
- To obtain higher grain yielde5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean (Vigna radiata)”
e5“To obtain higher grain yield, mungbean should be sown at normal time (1st week of August) with genotype PMB 14”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.