Abstract
The experiment was conducted at Main Agricultural Research Station (MARS), University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad during the rainy season of 2015 under rainfed condition to validate the integrated crop management practices with farmers’ practice. DGGV-2 variety was used for the experiment. Treatments consisted of two dates of sowing [Normal sowing date of the location (June 16th) and 15 days after normal sowing date] and two types of practices i.e. ICM v/s farmers’ practice [Improved nutrient, weed and pest and disease management practices v/s farmers’ practice] and they were sown in four blocks of 100 m2. There was 30.6 per cent decrease in yield in ICM practice is due to delay of wowing by 15 days, where in farmer’s practice it was 41.3 per cent under normal sowing due to farmer’s practice yield was reduced by 24.7 per cent (855kg/ha) compared to ICM practice (1066 kg/ha). The yield reduction in farmers practice under delayed sowing was 76.8 per cent compared to ICM under normal sowing. Maximum net returns were obtained in normal sown ICM (50120 Rs/ha) when compared to normal sown farmer’s practice (36350 RS/ha), 15 days late sown ICM (32620 Rs/ha) and 15 days late sown crop with farmers practice (18710 Rs/ha) The overall analysis of the study revealed that adoption of ICM technologies in greengram cultivation results in high profits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Delaying ICM sowing by 15 days reduced yield by 30.6%.
- Taxon
- Mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- delay of wowing by 15 dayse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 30.6 per cente0
- Comparator
- ICM practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“There was 30.6 per cent decrease in yield in ICM practice is due to delay of wowing by 15 days”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed farmer practice reduced yield by 41.3%.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- farmer’s practicee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 41.3 per cente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was 30.6 per cent decrease in yield in ICM practice is due to delay of wowing by 15 days, where in farmer’s practice it was 41.3 per cent”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal-sown farmer practice yield was 24.7% lower than ICM yield.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- farmer’s practicee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 24.7 per cente0
- Qualifier
- 855kg/hae0
- Comparator
- ICM practicee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“under normal sowing due to farmer’s practice yield was reduced by 24.7 per cent (855kg/ha) compared to ICM practice (1066 kg/ha)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Delayed farmer practice yield was 76.8% lower than normal ICM yield.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- farmers practice under delayed sowinge0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 76.8 per cente0
- Comparator
- ICM under normal sowinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield reduction in farmers practice under delayed sowing was 76.8 per cent compared to ICM under normal sowing”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal-sown ICM gave maximum net returns of 50120 Rs/ha.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- normal sown ICMe0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- Maximume0
- Value
- 50120 Rs/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Maximum net returns were obtained in normal sown ICM (50120 Rs/ha)”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Normal-sown farmer practice returned 36350 RS/ha.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- normal sown farmer’s practicee0
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Value
- 36350 RS/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“normal sown farmer’s practice (36350 RS/ha)”
e1“net returns”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Late-sown ICM returned 32620 Rs/ha.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- 15 days late sown ICMe0
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Value
- 32620 Rs/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“15 days late sown ICM (32620 Rs/ha)”
e1“net returns”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Late-sown farmer practice returned 18710 Rs/ha.
- Taxon
- MungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- 15 days late sown crop with farmers practicee0
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Value
- 18710 Rs/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“15 days late sown crop with farmers practice (18710 Rs/ha)”
e1“net returns”
t0“Mungbean”
Claim · model-written summary
Adopting ICM in greengram was concluded to increase profits.
- Taxon
- greengramVigna radiata var. radiatae0
- Treatment
- adoption of ICM technologiese0
- Outcome
- high profitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“adoption of ICM technologies in greengram cultivation results in high profits”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.