Abstract
[Objective] The aim was to explore the application effect of nano-synergism fertilizer on winter wheat.[Method] The effect of nano-synergism fertilizer on the yield and quality of winter wheat was studied by the field tests in different areas.[Result] After applying nano-synergism fertilizer,the increasing range in wheat yield was 12.34%-19.76%.The protein content of the wheat applied by nano-synergism fertilizer was decreased by 7.52% and the fat content was increased by 33%.The yield of wheat applied by the high amount urea fertilizer was increased by 2.31% than that of wheat applied by the low amount nano-synergism fertilizer,but compared with the wheat applied by high amount urea fertilizer,the saved amount of fertilizer per 667 m2 for the wheat applied by low amount nano-synergism fertilizer was 10 kg,which showed obvious fertilization saving effect.The middle amount nano-synergism fertilizer was the fertilizer with onetime application in autumn and it saved two-time topdressing process in spring than high amount urea fertilizer and was increased by 17.0%,which showed labour saving effect.[Conclusion] The research laid the foundation for the study on mechanism of application of nanometer material on fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-synergism fertilizer increased wheat yield by 12.34%-19.76%.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- nano-synergism fertilizere0
- Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 12.34%-19.76%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“After applying nano-synergism fertilizer,the increasing range in wheat yield was 12.34%-19.76%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-synergism fertilizer decreased wheat protein content by 7.52%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- nano-synergism fertilizere0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 7.52%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The protein content of the wheat applied by nano-synergism fertilizer was decreased by 7.52%”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano-synergism fertilizer increased wheat fat content by 33%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nano-synergism fertilizere1
- Outcome
- fat contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 33%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the fat content was increased by 33%”
e1“The protein content of the wheat applied by nano-synergism fertilizer was decreased by 7.52%”
t0“Winter Wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
High urea fertilizer yielded 2.31% more wheat than low nano-synergism fertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- high amount urea fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.31%e0
- Comparator
- low amount nano-synergism fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of wheat applied by the high amount urea fertilizer was increased by 2.31% than that of wheat applied by the low amount nano-synergism fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Low nano-synergism fertilizer saved 10 kg per 667 m2 compared with high urea fertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- low amount nano-synergism fertilizere0
- Outcome
- saved amount of fertilizere0
- Direction
- savede0
- Value
- 10 kge0
- Qualifier
- per 667 m2e0
- Comparator
- high amount urea fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with the wheat applied by high amount urea fertilizer,the saved amount of fertilizer per 667 m2 for the wheat applied by low amount nano-synergism fertilizer was 10 kg”
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn application of middle nano-synergism fertilizer saved two spring topdressings relative to high urea fertilizer.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- middle amount nano-synergism fertilizere0
- Outcome
- topdressing processe0
- Direction
- savede0
- Qualifier
- two-timee0
- Comparator
- high amount urea fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The middle amount nano-synergism fertilizer was the fertilizer with onetime application in autumn and it saved two-time topdressing process in spring than high amount urea fertilizer”
t0“Winter Wheat”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
256 papers more in this group
See all 260 papers →fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
284 papers more in this group
See all 288 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 501 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
562 papers more in this group
See all 566 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.