Abstract
Effects of rhizobium preparations, inoculation rate, application of nitrogen fertilizer and trace elements on growth of alfalfa were studied. The result showed that inoculation with different concentrations of rhizobium preparations had no significant effect on alfalfa emergence. Rhizobium absorbed in turf gave a good performance at the rate of 0.40 g/pot, while the effect of coated seeds was even better. The highest alfalfa yield was achieved by applying 0.03 g/pot nitrogen fertilizer under the condition of rhizobium inoculation. Trace elements had no significant effects on alfalfa yields except molybdenum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Different rhizobium preparation concentrations did not significantly affect alfalfa emergence.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- inoculation with different concentrations of rhizobium preparationse0
- Outcome
- alfalfa emergencee0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculation with different concentrations of rhizobium preparations had no significant effect on alfalfa emergence”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium absorbed in turf performed well at 0.40 g/pot.
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium absorbed in turf gave a good performance at the rate of 0.40 g/pot”
Claim · model-written summary
Coated seeds performed better than turf absorbed rhizobium.
- Treatment
- coated seedse0
- Outcome
- effect of coated seedse0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- Rhizobium absorbed in turfe0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Rhizobium absorbed in turf gave a good performance at the rate of 0.40 g/pot, while the effect of coated seeds was even better”
Claim · model-written summary
At rhizobium inoculation, 0.03 g/pot nitrogen fertilizer gave highest alfalfa yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- applying 0.03 g/pot nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- alfalfa yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest alfalfa yield was achieved by applying 0.03 g/pot nitrogen fertilizer under the condition of rhizobium inoculation”
Claim · model-written summary
Trace elements other than molybdenum had no significant effect on alfalfa yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- Trace elementse0
- Outcome
- alfalfa yieldse0
- Direction
- no significant effectse0
- Qualifier
- except molybdenume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Trace elements had no significant effects on alfalfa yields except molybdenum”
Claim · model-written summary
Molybdenum was an exception to the lack of significant trace element effects on alfalfa yield.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae0 - Treatment
- molybdenume0
- Outcome
- alfalfa yieldse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Trace elements had no significant effects on alfalfa yields except molybdenum”
The same questions in other papers
micronutrient · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
fertilization · Rhizobium · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
inoculation · Rhizobium · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.