Paper · 2009 · Zhongguo caodi xuebao

Effects of Inoculation of Rhizobium and Application of Phosphate Fertilizer on Alfalfa "Gongnong No.1"

Zhang Yong-liang

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of inoculation of rhizobium and application of phosphate fertilizer on alfalfa Gongnong No.1were studied.The results showed that basic application of phosphate fertilizer increased nodulation rate,root nodule number and weight per plant,branch number and hay yield of alfalfa Gongnong No.1significantly.The effect of application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizer was the best.The effect of inoculation of rhizobium combined with application of phosphate fertilizer was better than inoculation of rhizobium alone or basic application of phosphate fertilizer alone.Among all treatments,the effect of inoculating rhizobium 3.75kg/hm2 combined with application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizing was the best.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal phosphate fertilizer significantly increased alfalfa nodulation rate, root nodule number and nodule weight per plant.

Taxon
alfalfa Gongnong No.1e0
Treatment
basic application of phosphate fertilizere0
Outcome
nodulation rate,root nodule number and weight per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“basic application of phosphate fertilizer increased nodulation rate,root nodule number and weight per plant,branch number and hay yield of alfalfa Gongnong No.1significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal phosphate fertilizer significantly increased alfalfa branch number and hay yield.

Taxon
alfalfa Gongnong No.1e0
Treatment
basic application of phosphate fertilizere0
Outcome
branch number and hay yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“basic application of phosphate fertilizer increased nodulation rate,root nodule number and weight per plant,branch number and hay yield of alfalfa Gongnong No.1significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizer gave the best reported effect.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizere0
Outcome
beste0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizer was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation combined with phosphate fertilizer performed better than either alone.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculation of rhizobium combined with application of phosphate fertilizere0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
inoculation of rhizobium alone or basic application of phosphate fertilizer alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of inoculation of rhizobium combined with application of phosphate fertilizer was better than inoculation of rhizobium alone or basic application of phosphate fertilizer alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–577 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3.75kg/hm2 rhizobium plus 300kg/hm2 perphosphate treatment performed best among treatments.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
inoculating rhizobium 3.75kg/hm2 combined with application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizinge0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
beste0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all treatments,the effect of inoculating rhizobium 3.75kg/hm2 combined with application of 300kg/hm2 perphosphate fertilizing was the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · Rhizobium · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.