Paper · 2009 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and yields of winter wheat

Dongyun Ma

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthesis,physiology and yield characteristics of two winter wheat(Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars(Yumai 49 with a multiple spike and Yumai 66 with a heavy spike) were systematically studied in two successive years in the field.The results showed that the sulphur fertilization plays an important role in improving canopy apparent photosynthesis,flag leaf's net photosynthesis,leaf's chlorophyll content and flag leaf's nitric acid reductase activity.However,there were differences among the different sulphur fertilizer treatments,and as well as between the two cultivars.In addition,the study also indicates that there are differences in increasing grain yield and improving yield characteristics of the two cultivars among the different sulphureous fertilizer application.On the whole,compared with photosynthesis,physiology and yield characteristics and input cost during wheat growth stage,the rate of S fertilizer recommended presently is S 120 kg/ha as base fertilizer application for the cultivars under the high-yield wheat field conditions in Henan province of China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization improved canopy apparent photosynthesis and flag leaf net photosynthesis in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulphur fertilizatione1
Outcome
canopy apparent photosynthesis,flag leaf's net photosynthesise1
Direction
improvinge1
Setting
in the fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and yields of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e0

“systematically studied in two successive years in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–272 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sulphur fertilization plays an important role in improving canopy apparent photosynthesis,flag leaf's net photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization improved leaf chlorophyll content and flag leaf nitric acid reductase activity in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
sulphur fertilizatione1
Outcome
leaf's chlorophyll content and flag leaf's nitric acid reductase activitye2
Direction
improvinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and yields of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sulphur fertilization plays an important role in improving canopy apparent photosynthesis,flag leaf's net photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–421 · show in text ↑
e2

“leaf's chlorophyll content and flag leaf's nitric acid reductase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–495 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were differences among the sulphur fertilizer treatments and between the two winter wheat cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
two cultivarse3
Treatment
different sulphur fertilizer treatmentse3
Outcome
differencese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and yields of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e3

“there were differences among the different sulphur fertilizer treatments,and as well as between the two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–617 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences among the sulphureous fertilizer applications were found in increasing grain yield and improving yield characteristics of the two cultivars.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
different sulphureous fertilizer applicatione4
Outcome
increasing grain yield and improving yield characteristicse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and yields of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e4

“there are differences in increasing grain yield and improving yield characteristics of the two cultivars among the different sulphureous fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–819 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur fertilizer rate recommended at present for high-yield wheat fields in Henan province is S 120 kg/ha as base fertilizer.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
rate of S fertilizer recommended presentlye5
Value
S 120 kg/hae5
Setting
Henan province of Chinae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effects of sulphureous fertilization on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics and yields of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e5

“the rate of S fertilizer recommended presently is S 120 kg/ha as base fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1032 · show in text ↑
e6

“high-yield wheat field conditions in Henan province of China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1121 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 126 positive, 7 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.