Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Optimizing Sulfur Fertilization for Enhanced Physiological Performance, Grain Filling Characteristics, and Grain Yield of High-Yielding Winter Wheat Under Drip Irrigation

Hongxiao Duan; Wenlu Li; Yulei Jiang; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The North China Plain is one of the major wheat cultivation regions. As a cornerstone of global food security, wheat makes the enhancement of its yield critically important. Sulfur critically regulates photosynthesis, antioxidant defense, and grain filling dynamics. To elucidate the physiological mechanisms of S in wheat grain filling and guide field practices, a two-year field experiment (2022–2023 and 2023–2024) was conducted in the North China Plain using two dominant cultivars, Jimai 20 (JM20) and Yannong 999 (YN999). Four sulfur (ammonium sulfate) gradients (S1: 15 kg ha−1; S2: 30 kg ha−1; S3: 45 kg ha−1; S4: 60 kg ha−1) and a control (S0) were applied at the jointing stage via a drip fertigation system. The key findings reveal that optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1) enhanced post-anthesis photosynthetic capacity by increasing flag leaf SPAD values and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity while reducing malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation, thereby delaying leaf senescence. These improvements translated into optimized grain filling parameters: YN999 and JM20 exhibited 2.27–5.62% and 13.20–13.86% increases in mean grain filling rate, 3.92–4.73% and 2.11–4.36% extensions in grain filling duration, and 7.62–7.83% and 9.55–10.23% boosts in thousand grain weight, respectively. Consequently, yield increased by 0.58–1.54 t ha−1 for YN999 and 1.36–1.49 t ha−1 for JM20. Under drip fertigation conditions in the North China Plain, sulfur application at 30–45 kg ha−1 effectively enhances wheat yield. These findings provide fertilization guidance for the development of precision agriculture and can help alleviate the local soil sulfur deficiency trend.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sulfur increased flag leaf SPAD values.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1)e0
Outcome
flag leaf SPAD valuese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1) enhanced post-anthesis photosynthetic capacity by increasing flag leaf SPAD values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sulfur increased superoxide dismutase activity.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1)e0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD) activitye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1) enhanced post-anthesis photosynthetic capacity by increasing flag leaf SPAD values and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sulfur reduced malondialdehyde accumulation.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1)e0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimal S application (YN999: 45 kg ha−1; JM20: 30–45 kg ha−1) enhanced post-anthesis photosynthetic capacity by increasing flag leaf SPAD values and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity while reducing malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal sulfur delayed leaf senescence.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
leaf senescencee0
Direction
delayinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“thereby delaying leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YN999 mean grain filling rate rose 2.27–5.62%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
YN999e0
Outcome
mean grain filling ratee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
2.27–5.62%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“YN999 and JM20 exhibited 2.27–5.62% and 13.20–13.86% increases in mean grain filling rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM20 mean grain filling rate rose 13.20–13.86%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM20e0
Outcome
mean grain filling ratee0
Direction
increasese0
Value
13.20–13.86%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“YN999 and JM20 exhibited 2.27–5.62% and 13.20–13.86% increases in mean grain filling rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YN999 grain filling duration extended 3.92–4.73%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain filling duratione0
Direction
extensionse0
Value
3.92–4.73%e0

Not reportedMaterialTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“3.92–4.73% and 2.11–4.36% extensions in grain filling duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM20 grain filling duration extended 2.11–4.36%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
grain filling duratione0
Direction
extensionse0
Value
2.11–4.36%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“3.92–4.73% and 2.11–4.36% extensions in grain filling duration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YN999 thousand grain weight increased 7.62–7.83%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
boostse0
Value
7.62–7.83%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“7.62–7.83% and 9.55–10.23% boosts in thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM20 thousand grain weight increased 9.55–10.23%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
thousand grain weighte0
Direction
boostse0
Value
9.55–10.23%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“7.62–7.83% and 9.55–10.23% boosts in thousand grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1249–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

YN999 yield increased 0.58–1.54 t ha−1.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
YN999e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.58–1.54 t ha−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield increased by 0.58–1.54 t ha−1 for YN999”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

JM20 yield increased 1.36–1.49 t ha−1.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
JM20e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.36–1.49 t ha−1e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“yield increased by 0.58–1.54 t ha−1 for YN999 and 1.36–1.49 t ha−1 for JM20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1412 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 30–45 kg ha−1 sulfur for drip-fertigated wheat.

Outcome
sulfur application at 30–45 kg ha−1e0
Setting
North China Plaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 136–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under drip fertigation conditions in the North China Plain, sulfur application at 30–45 kg ha−1 effectively enhances wheat yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1543 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.