Paper · 2005 · Xinjiang nongye kexue

Preparation of Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS for cotton seed treatment

Haobin Li

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS for cotton seed treatment was reported, including its active ingredients selection, preparation method, main technical properties and field efficacy. The field efficacy trials results showed that the control effects with Imidacloprid+Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS applied at 1g product/40~60 g cotton seeds had better effect on controlling disease and insect pests at the seedling stage in cotton field. All treatments of Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS do not negatively influence on the emergence of cotton seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS applied at 1 g product per 40-60 g cotton seeds gave better control of disease and insect pests at the seedling stage in the cotton field.

Organ / stage
seedling stagee1
Treatment
Imidacloprid+Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS applied at 1g product/40~60 g cotton seedse1
Outcome
controlling disease and insect pestse1
Direction
bettere1
Setting
cotton fielde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preparation of Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS for cotton seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control effects with Imidacloprid+Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS applied at 1g product/40~60 g cotton seeds had better effect on controlling disease and insect pests at the seedling stage in cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS treatments did not negatively influence cotton seedling emergence.

Treatment
Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FSe2
Outcome
emergence of cotton seedlingse2
Direction
do not negatively influencee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Preparation of Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS for cotton seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“All treatments of Imidacloprid + Thiram + Carbendazim 27% FS do not negatively influence on the emergence of cotton seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–574 · show in text ↑

thiram · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carbendazim · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

imidacloprid · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

carbendazim · pest · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.