Abstract
ABSTRACT The quality loss of table grape (cv. Crimson seedless ) packaged in different films was studied in order to appraise the effects induced by girdling technique combined with a gibberellins treatment on product storability. The cultural practices successfully enhanced the quality of the berries. From a packaging point of view, all the investigated films successfully preserved the quality of the packed fruit, with some relevant differences for the highest gas barrier films. A better score in the overall acceptability was for grape packaged in multi‐layer laminated nylon/polyolefin and biodegradable starch/polyester‐based films. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS The results obtained in this work can give a new contribution to the field by providing information on combined strategies to prolong the shelf life of ready‐to‐use table grape. The bio‐based packaging system exerted a very attractive performance, thus allowing proposing it as a potential alternative to petroleum source packaging.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Girdling combined with gibberellins enhanced berry quality.
- Taxon
- table grapee2
- Treatment
- girdling technique combined with a gibberellins treatmente0
- Outcome
- quality of the berriese1
- Direction
- enhancede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“girdling technique combined with a gibberellins treatment”
e1“The cultural practices successfully enhanced the quality of the berries”
e2“table grape (cv. Crimson seedless )”
Claim · model-written summary
All investigated films preserved packed grape quality.
- Taxon
- table grapee1
- Treatment
- all the investigated filmse0
- Outcome
- quality of the packed fruite0
- Direction
- preservede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“all the investigated films successfully preserved the quality of the packed fruit”
e1“table grape (cv. Crimson seedless )”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher gas barrier films differed in quality preservation.
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“with some relevant differences for the highest gas barrier films”
e1“table grape (cv. Crimson seedless )”
Claim · model-written summary
Multi-layer laminated nylon/polyolefin packaging gave a better overall acceptability score.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- multi‐layer laminated nylon/polyolefine0
- Outcome
- overall acceptabilitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A better score in the overall acceptability was for grape packaged in multi‐layer laminated nylon/polyolefin and biodegradable starch/polyester‐based films”
Claim · model-written summary
Biodegradable starch/polyester-based packaging gave a better overall acceptability score.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- biodegradable starch/polyester‐based filmse0
- Outcome
- overall acceptabilitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“A better score in the overall acceptability was for grape packaged in multi‐layer laminated nylon/polyolefin and biodegradable starch/polyester‐based films”
Claim · model-written summary
The bio-based packaging system showed attractive performance as a potential alternative.
Verbatim
e0“The bio‐based packaging system exerted a very attractive performance, thus allowing proposing it as a potential alternative to petroleum source packaging”
e1“table grape (cv. Crimson seedless )”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: general · VitisResults differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →class · quality: general · VitisResults agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.