Paper · 2010

Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on Expression of Shikimate Pathway-Related Genes in Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) Berries

Chu Ying

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of radiation of UV-A,UV-B and UV-C,respectively,with six doses on the expression of the genes in shikimate pathway and post-chorismate pathway in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom,by means of real-time PCR. The results showed that the transcript abundance of these genes in response to UV radiation was dose-dependent,but not synchronized. A certain dose of UV radiation could significantly induce the expression of most of genes in shikimate pathway and the expression of VvCM-1,VvCM-2 and VvAS in post-chorismate pathway,but gene expression was reduced when higher or lower radiation was applied. Various genes showed different responses to the same type of UV radiation. Three types of UV all most significantly induced transcript abundances of both VvDAHPS-1 and VvDAHPS-2 that encode the entry isozymes of shikimate pathway,whereas short wavelength UV suppressed the accumulation of their transcripts. The expression of VvSK and VvCS was promoted only by UV-A radiation of 1.2 kJ·m-2,but not by UV-B and UV-C radiation. In post-chorismate pathway,the transcrip-tional induction of VvCM-1 by UV radiation was more significant than that of either VvCM-2 or VvAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV responses of pathway gene transcripts were dose dependent but unsynchronized.

Taxon
grapee1
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Organ / stage
berriese1
Treatment
UV radiatione0
Outcome
transcript abundance of these genese0
Qualifier
dose-dependent,but not synchronizede0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the transcript abundance of these genes in response to UV radiation was dose-dependent,but not synchronized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–433 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A certain UV dose significantly induced expression of most shikimate-pathway genes.

Taxon
grapee1
Organ / stage
berriese1
Treatment
A certain dose of UV radiatione0
Outcome
expression of most of genes in shikimate pathwaye0
Direction
inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A certain dose of UV radiation could significantly induce the expression of most of genes in shikimate pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–544 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A certain UV dose induced VvCM-1 expression.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
A certain dose of UV radiatione0
Gene
VvCM-1e0
Outcome
expression of VvCM-1e0
Direction
inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A certain dose of UV radiation could significantly induce the expression of most of genes in shikimate pathway and the expression of VvCM-1,VvCM-2 and VvAS in post-chorismate pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A certain UV dose induced VvCM-2 expression.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
A certain dose of UV radiatione0
Gene
VvCM-2e0
Outcome
expression of VvCM-1,VvCM-2 and VvASe0
Direction
inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A certain dose of UV radiation could significantly induce the expression of most of genes in shikimate pathway and the expression of VvCM-1,VvCM-2 and VvAS in post-chorismate pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A certain UV dose induced VvAS expression.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
A certain dose of UV radiatione0
Gene
VvASe0
Outcome
expression of VvCM-1,VvCM-2 and VvASe0
Direction
inducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A certain dose of UV radiation could significantly induce the expression of most of genes in shikimate pathway and the expression of VvCM-1,VvCM-2 and VvAS in post-chorismate pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene expression was reduced at higher or lower UV doses.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
higher or lower radiatione0
Outcome
gene expressione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“gene expression was reduced when higher or lower radiation was applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different genes responded differently to the same UV radiation type.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
same type of UV radiatione0
Outcome
different responsese0

Verbatim

e0

“Various genes showed different responses to the same type of UV radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–767 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three UV types most significantly induced VvDAHPS-1 transcript abundance.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
Three types of UVe0
Gene
VvDAHPS-1e0
Outcome
transcript abundancese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Three types of UV all most significantly induced transcript abundances of both VvDAHPS-1 and VvDAHPS-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All three UV types most significantly induced VvDAHPS-2 transcript abundance.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
Three types of UVe0
Gene
VvDAHPS-2e0
Outcome
transcript abundancese0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Three types of UV all most significantly induced transcript abundances of both VvDAHPS-1 and VvDAHPS-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–870 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short wavelength UV suppressed accumulation of VvDAHPS-1 and VvDAHPS-2 transcripts.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
short wavelength UVe0
Gene
VvDAHPS-1 and VvDAHPS-2e0
Outcome
accumulation of their transcriptse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Three types of UV all most significantly induced transcript abundances of both VvDAHPS-1 and VvDAHPS-2 that encode the entry isozymes of shikimate pathway,whereas short wavelength UV suppressed the accumulation of their transcripts.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–1000 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A at 1.2 kJ·m-2 promoted VvSK expression, unlike UV-B or UV-C.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
UV-A radiation of 1.2 kJ·m-2e0
Gene
VvSKe0
Outcome
expression of VvSK and VvCSe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
UV-B and UV-C radiatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of VvSK and VvCS was promoted only by UV-A radiation of 1.2 kJ·m-2,but not by UV-B and UV-C radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-A at 1.2 kJ·m-2 promoted VvCS expression, unlike UV-B or UV-C.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
UV-A radiation of 1.2 kJ·m-2e0
Gene
VvCSe0
Outcome
expression of VvSK and VvCSe0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
UV-B and UV-C radiatione0

Verbatim

e0

“The expression of VvSK and VvCS was promoted only by UV-A radiation of 1.2 kJ·m-2,but not by UV-B and UV-C radiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

UV induction of VvCM-1 transcription was more significant than for VvCM-2 or VvAS.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
UV radiatione0
Gene
VvCM-1e0
Outcome
transcrip-tional induction of VvCM-1e0
Direction
more significante0
Comparator
VvCM-2 or VvASe0

Verbatim

e0

“the transcrip-tional induction of VvCM-1 by UV radiation was more significant than that of either VvCM-2 or VvAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. 'Cabernet Sauvignon') berries at 11 weeks after full bloom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–273 · show in text ↑

radiation · molecular: expression · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

uv · molecular: expression · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.