Abstract
The research showed that the pH value of Albic soil will reduce in long-term continuous cropping. The decreased range of pH value of applying chemical fertilizer and straw returning to soil were bigger than no fertilization and applying organic fertilizer. The yield of soybean continuous cropping with applying organic fertilizer was significant higher than that with applying chemical fertilizer in Ablic soils, and the chemical fertilizer was higher than straw returning to soil and no fertilization.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Albic soil pH declined under long-term continuous cropping.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- long-term continuous croppinge0
- Outcome
- pH value of Albic soile0
- Direction
- reducee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the pH value of Albic soil will reduce in long-term continuous cropping”
t0“Soybean Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer and straw returning caused greater soil pH decreases than no fertilization and organic fertilizer.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- applying chemical fertilizer and straw returning to soile0
- Outcome
- decreased range of pH valuee0
- Direction
- biggere0
- Comparator
- no fertilization and applying organic fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The decreased range of pH value of applying chemical fertilizer and straw returning to soil were bigger than no fertilization and applying organic fertilizer”
t0“Soybean Yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic fertilizer yielded significantly more soybean than chemical fertilizer.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- applying organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yield of soybeane0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- applying chemical fertilizere0
- Setting
- Ablic soilse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield of soybean continuous cropping with applying organic fertilizer was significant higher than that with applying chemical fertilizer in Ablic soils”
Claim · model-written summary
Chemical fertilizer yielded more soybean than straw returning or no fertilizer.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- chemical fertilizere0
- Outcome
- yield of soybeane1
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- straw returning to soil and no fertilizatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the chemical fertilizer was higher than straw returning to soil and no fertilization”
e1“yield of soybean”
The same questions in other papers
organic · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.