Paper · 2010 · Dadou kexue

Water Use Efficiency of Soybean under Different Mulching in Dryland

Ruping Yang

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to improve the cultivation technique of covering film and reduce drought stress in semi-arid regions,field experiments was conducted on soybean which under drought stress by different mulching modes in the semi-arid regions of west Loess Plateau in Gansu Province.Soil water content increased obviously and water consumption reduced in whole phonological stages under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF).The yield and water use efficiency(WUE) reached 3279.8 kg·ha-1 and 12.8 kg·ha-1·mm-1 respectively,which increased by 14.0% and 19.6% when compared with film mulching on rows(FMOR) and increased by 41.9% and 58.0% when compared with no film mulching(NFM) mode,respectively.FMORAF could maintain soil moisture during earlier stage effectively,and in the latter growth stage water from deep soil could be used in soybean plants by FMORAF.The results suggested that FMORAF is a useful and efficient way to enhance the yield and rain water use efficiency(RWUE) of soybean in dry fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow film mulching increased soil water content.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF)e0
Outcome
Soil water contente0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
semi-arid regions of west Loess Plateau in Gansu Provincee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil water content increased obviously and water consumption reduced in whole phonological stages under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“semi-arid regions of west Loess Plateau in Gansu Province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge and furrow film mulching reduced water consumption across growth stages.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF)e0
Outcome
water consumptione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
whole phonological stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water consumption reduced in whole phonological stages under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FMORAF soybean yield was 3279.8 kg·ha-1, 14.0% above FMOR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FMORAFe1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3279.8 kg·ha-1e0
Qualifier
14.0%e0
Comparator
film mulching on rows(FMOR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and water use efficiency(WUE) reached 3279.8 kg·ha-1 and 12.8 kg·ha-1·mm-1 respectively,which increased by 14.0% and 19.6% when compared with film mulching on rows(FMOR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FMORAF water use efficiency was 12.8 kg·ha-1·mm-1, 19.6% above FMOR.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FMORAFe1
Outcome
water use efficiency(WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.8 kg·ha-1·mm-1e0
Qualifier
19.6%e0
Comparator
film mulching on rows(FMOR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency(WUE) reached 3279.8 kg·ha-1 and 12.8 kg·ha-1·mm-1 respectively,which increased by 14.0% and 19.6% when compared with film mulching on rows(FMOR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FMORAF yield increased by 41.9% versus no film mulching.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FMORAFe1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede0
Value
41.9%e0
Comparator
no film mulching(NFM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased by 41.9% and 58.0% when compared with no film mulching(NFM) mode,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–435 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield and water use efficiency(WUE) reached”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FMORAF water use efficiency increased by 58.0% versus no film mulching.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FMORAFe1
Outcome
water use efficiency(WUE)e2
Direction
increasede0
Value
58.0%e0
Comparator
no film mulching(NFM)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased by 41.9% and 58.0% when compared with no film mulching(NFM) mode,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
e1

“under the treatment of film mulching on ridge and furrow(FMORAF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–435 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield and water use efficiency(WUE) reached”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FMORAF maintained soil moisture in the earlier stage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FMORAFe0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
maintaine0
Qualifier
earlier stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FMORAF could maintain soil moisture during earlier stage effectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FMORAF allowed soybean plants to use deep soil water later in growth.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
FMORAFe0
Outcome
water from deep soil could be used in soybean plantse0
Qualifier
latter growth stagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the latter growth stage water from deep soil could be used in soybean plants by FMORAF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–870 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend FMORAF to increase soybean yield and rain water use efficiency in dry fields.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
enhance the yield and rain water use efficiency(RWUE) of soybean in dry fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FMORAF is a useful and efficient way to enhance the yield and rain water use efficiency(RWUE) of soybean in dry fields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1017 · show in text ↑

mulching · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

irrigation · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mulching · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

58 papers: 51 positive, 7 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 61 positive, 8 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

mulching · physiology: water · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.