Abstract
Two times experiments of dosage reduction of methyl bromide(MB) and covering virtually impermeable film(VIF) were carried out in Qingzhou city(Shandong province,China) from 2001 to 2003 year.The results indicated that there were no significant difference on controlling the root-knot nematode(Meloidogyne spp.),tomato growth and yield between using 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIF and 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PE.The VIF could significantly reduce the emission of methyl bromide,so the dosage of methyl bromide could be reduced more than 25% and then its damage to ozone layer also was reduced.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The lower methyl bromide dose with VIF gave no significant difference in root-knot nematode control against the higher dose with PE.
- Treatment
- 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIFe0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne spp.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogynee0pathogen - Outcome
- controlling the root-knot nematode(Meloidogyne spp.)e0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PEe0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“there were no significant difference on controlling the root-knot nematode(Meloidogyne spp.),tomato growth and yield between using 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIF and 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PE”
Claim · model-written summary
The lower dose with VIF gave no significant difference in tomato growth against the higher dose with PE.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIFe0
- Outcome
- tomato growthe0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PEe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were no significant difference on controlling the root-knot nematode(Meloidogyne spp.),tomato growth and yield between using 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIF and 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PE”
Claim · model-written summary
The lower dose with VIF gave no significant difference in tomato yield against the higher dose with PE.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIFe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no significant differencee0
- Comparator
- 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PEe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were no significant difference on controlling the root-knot nematode(Meloidogyne spp.),tomato growth and yield between using 37.5 g/m~2 methyl bromide and VIF and 50 g/m~2 methyl bromide and PE”
Claim · model-written summary
VIF significantly reduced methyl bromide emissions.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The VIF could significantly reduce the emission of methyl bromide”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded methyl bromide dosage could be reduced more than 25%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the dosage of methyl bromide could be reduced more than 25%”
Claim · model-written summary
The lower dosage was said to reduce ozone-layer damage.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“its damage to ozone layer also was reduced”
The same questions in other papers
bromomethane · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
bromomethane · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
bromomethane · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.