Paper · 2008 · Nematropica

Effects of reduced rates of Telone C35 and methyl bromide in conjunction with virtually impermeable film on weeds and root-knot nematodes.

J. E. Hamill; John E. Thomas; L.‐T. Ou; et al.

18
claims
31
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Hamill, J. E., J. E. Thomas, L.-T. Ou, L. H. Allen, Jr., N. Kokalis-Burelle, and D. W. Dickson. 2008. Effects of reduced rates of Telone C35 and methyl bromide in conjunction with virtually impermeable film on weeds and root-knot nematodes. Nematropica 38:37-46. Two field trials were conducted in Florida in 2004 to test the efficacy of reduced rates of the fumigants methyl bromide (67% methyl bromide plus 33% chloropicrin) and Telone C35 (1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D), 65% plus chloropicrin 35%) in combination with virtually impermeable film (VIF) and standard low density polyethylene (LDPE) film. In spring grown tomato, reducing rates of methyl bromide by 25% under VIF provided comparable control to full rates with regard to nutsedge (mixture of purple and yellow). All fumigants performed better with regard to nutsedge control under VIF than under LDPE. Root-galling, caused by Meloidogyne spp. juveniles (J2) in soil, and marketable yields in reduced rates of methyl bromide were also similar to the full rate regardless of film type. Plots treated with Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIF reduced nutsedge densities, had lower gall ratings, and had higher marketable yields than nontreated plots, but were not comparable to methyl bromide. Reducing rates of Telone C35 by 25 and 50% had negative impacts on yield compared to all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha, regardless of film type. In double-cropped cucumber, none of the treatments had gall-ratings different than nontreated plots. In autumn grown squash, all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 treatments had higher marketable yields and lower gall ratings than nontreated plots. Plots treated with Telone C35 using VIF had the lowest nutsedge densities. All methyl bromide treatments under VIF had lower nutsedge densities than nontreated plots. Plots that were treated with chloropicrin or chloropicrin plus metam potassium as an in-bed treatment had higher nutsedge densities than nontreated plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced methyl bromide under VIF gave comparable nutsedge control to the full rate in spring tomato.

Treatment
reducing rates of methyl bromide by 25% under VIFe0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
full ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spring grown tomato, reducing rates of methyl bromide by 25% under VIF provided comparable control to full rates with regard to nutsedge (mixture of purple and yellow).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fumigants controlled nutsedge better under VIF than LDPE.

Treatment
All fumigantse0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
nutsedge controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
LDPEe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All fumigants performed better with regard to nutsedge control under VIF than under LDPE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–864 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced methyl bromide gave similar root galling to full rate regardless of film.

Treatment
reduced rates of methyl bromidee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee0pathogen
Outcome
Root-gallinge0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
regardless of film typee0
Comparator
the full ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-galling, caused by Meloidogyne spp. juveniles (J2) in soil, and marketable yields in reduced rates of methyl bromide were also similar to the full rate regardless of film type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced methyl bromide gave similar marketable yields to full rate regardless of film.

Treatment
reduced rates of methyl bromidee0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
regardless of film typee0
Comparator
the full ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root-galling, caused by Meloidogyne spp. juveniles (J2) in soil, and marketable yields in reduced rates of methyl bromide were also similar to the full rate regardless of film type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha with VIF reduced nutsedge densities against untreated plots.

Treatment
Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIFe0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
nutsedge densitiese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIF reduced nutsedge densities, had lower gall ratings, and had higher marketable yields than nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha with VIF lowered gall ratings against untreated plots.

Treatment
Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIFe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne spp.Meloidogynee1pathogen
Outcome
gall ratingse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne
Meloidogyne · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIF reduced nutsedge densities, had lower gall ratings, and had higher marketable yields than nontreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“Root-galling, caused by Meloidogyne spp. juveniles (J2) in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–928 · show in text ↑
e2

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha with VIF raised marketable yield against untreated plots, though it was not comparable to methyl bromide.

Treatment
Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIFe0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
not comparable to methyl bromidee0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha in conjunction with VIF reduced nutsedge densities, had lower gall ratings, and had higher marketable yields than nontreated plots, but were not comparable to methyl bromide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing Telone C35 by 25% lowered tomato yield relative to methyl bromide treatments and full Telone C35 regardless of film.

Treatment
Reducing rates of Telone C35 by 25e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negative impactse0
Qualifier
regardless of film typee0
Comparator
all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 at 327 liters/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing rates of Telone C35 by 25 and 50% had negative impacts on yield compared to all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha, regardless of film type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing Telone C35 by 50% lowered tomato yield relative to methyl bromide treatments and full Telone C35 regardless of film.

Treatment
Telone C35 by 25 and 50%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
negative impactse0
Qualifier
regardless of film typee0
Comparator
all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 at 327 liters/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reducing rates of Telone C35 by 25 and 50% had negative impacts on yield compared to all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 at 327 liters/ha, regardless of film type.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“In spring grown tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not differ from untreated plots in gall ratings for double-cropped cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
none of the treatmentse0
Outcome
gall-ratingse0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In double-cropped cucumber, none of the treatments had gall-ratings different than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide treatments increased marketable yield in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
all methyl bromide treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“In autumn grown squash, all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 treatments had higher marketable yields and lower gall ratings than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Telone C35 treatments increased marketable yield in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
Telone C35 treatmentse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“In autumn grown squash, all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 treatments had higher marketable yields and lower gall ratings than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide treatments lowered gall ratings in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
all methyl bromide treatmentse0
Outcome
gall ratingse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“In autumn grown squash, all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 treatments had higher marketable yields and lower gall ratings than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Telone C35 treatments lowered gall ratings in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
Telone C35 treatmentse0
Outcome
gall ratingse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“In autumn grown squash, all methyl bromide treatments and Telone C35 treatments had higher marketable yields and lower gall ratings than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Telone C35 under VIF yielded the lowest nutsedge densities in autumn squash.

Taxon
squashe1
Treatment
Telone C35 using VIFe0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
nutsedge densitiese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with Telone C35 using VIF had the lowest nutsedge densities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1772 · show in text ↑
e1

“In autumn grown squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl bromide treatments under VIF lowered nutsedge densities in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe1
Treatment
All methyl bromide treatments under VIFe0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
nutsedge densitiese0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“All methyl bromide treatments under VIF had lower nutsedge densities than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1773–1864 · show in text ↑
e1

“In autumn grown squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin treatment raised nutsedge densities in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe1
Treatment
chloropicrine0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
nutsedge densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plots that were treated with chloropicrin or chloropicrin plus metam potassium as an in-bed treatment had higher nutsedge densities than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–2019 · show in text ↑
e1

“In autumn grown squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chloropicrin plus metam potassium in-bed treatment raised nutsedge densities in autumn squash relative to untreated plots.

Taxon
squashe1
Treatment
chloropicrin plus metam potassium as an in-bed treatmente0
Interactor
nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
nutsedge densitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nontreated plotse0

Verbatim

e0

“Plots that were treated with chloropicrin or chloropicrin plus metam potassium as an in-bed treatment had higher nutsedge densities than nontreated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1865–2019 · show in text ↑
e1

“In autumn grown squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1565 · show in text ↑

bromomethane · Meloidogyne · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

bromomethane · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.