Paper · 2009 · Agrochemicals

Biological Activity of Several Fungicides and Mixtures against Grape Leaf Spot

Miao Ze

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grape leaf spot is an important disease and there is a certain degree of difficulty in chemical control.Efficacies of ten fungicides against the causal agent of grape brown spot were compared in laboratory.Flusilazole 40% EC,prochloraz 50% WP,difenoconazole 10% WG were highly effective against grape brown spot.By mixture screening,difenoconazole 10% WG:carbendazim 50% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1),flusilazole 40% EC:mancozeb 70% WP(4:1,2:1),prochloraz 50% WP:thiophanate-methyl 70% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1) provided good control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flusilazole 40% EC, prochloraz 50% WP and difenoconazole 10% WG were highly effective against grape brown spot in laboratory tests.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
Flusilazole 40% EC,prochloraz 50% WP,difenoconazole 10% WGe1
Interactor
causal agent of grape brown spote0pathogen
Outcome
highly effectivee1
Setting
laboratorye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacies of ten fungicides against the causal agent of grape brown spot were compared in laboratory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–205 · show in text ↑
e1

“Flusilazole 40% EC,prochloraz 50% WP,difenoconazole 10% WG were highly effective against grape brown spot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–311 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture difenoconazole 10% WG:carbendazim 50% WP (4:1, 2:1, 1:1) provided good control of grape brown spot.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
difenoconazole 10% WG:carbendazim 50% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1)e2
Interactor
causal agent of grape brown spote0pathogen
Outcome
good controle2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacies of ten fungicides against the causal agent of grape brown spot were compared in laboratory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–205 · show in text ↑
e2

“difenoconazole 10% WG:carbendazim 50% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1),flusilazole 40% EC:mancozeb 70% WP(4:1,2:1),prochloraz 50% WP:thiophanate-methyl 70% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1) provided good control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture flusilazole 40% EC with mancozeb 70% WP provided good control of grape brown spot.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
flusilazole 40% EC:mancozeb 70% WP(4:1,2:1)e2
Interactor
causal agent of grape brown spote0pathogen
Outcome
good controle2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacies of ten fungicides against the causal agent of grape brown spot were compared in laboratory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–205 · show in text ↑
e2

“difenoconazole 10% WG:carbendazim 50% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1),flusilazole 40% EC:mancozeb 70% WP(4:1,2:1),prochloraz 50% WP:thiophanate-methyl 70% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1) provided good control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mixture prochloraz 50% WP with thiophanate-methyl 70% WP provided good control of grape brown spot.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
prochloraz 50% WP:thiophanate-methyl 70% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1)e2
Interactor
causal agent of grape brown spote0pathogen
Outcome
good controle2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Efficacies of ten fungicides against the causal agent of grape brown spot were compared in laboratory”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–205 · show in text ↑
e2

“difenoconazole 10% WG:carbendazim 50% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1),flusilazole 40% EC:mancozeb 70% WP(4:1,2:1),prochloraz 50% WP:thiophanate-methyl 70% WP(4:1,2:1,1:1) provided good control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–509 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

difenoconazole · control · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

prochloraz · control · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiophanate-methyl · control · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mancozeb · control · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.