Paper · 2009 · Journal of Yangtze University Agricultural Science Volume

Control Effect of Three Chemicals on Uncinula Necator of Two Grape Varieties

Duan Kun-jie

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Grape powdery mildew, wide-spread in each grape-producing areas in China, is a harmful fungus disease to the leaves and fruits of vine.Two grape cultivars of Vitis vinifera L.—‘9307’ and ‘Victoria’ were used as experimental materials so as to study the effects of three chemicals—50% Yisheng WP 600 times solution, 70% WeiErda Jiajituobujing WP 600 times solution and 50% Carbendazim WP 1000 times solution—on controlling grape powdery mildew. The result showed that control effect of 50% Yisheng WP 600 times solution and 70% WeiErda Jiajituobujing WP 600 times solution on powdery mildew were the best; 50% carbendazim WP 1000 times solution was the worst. In addition, as to the control effect of three chemicals after spraying three times on powdery mildew of the two grape cultivars, ‘9307’ was superior to Victoria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yisheng solution had among the best control effects on powdery mildew.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
50% Yisheng WP 600 times solutione0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“control effect of 50% Yisheng WP 600 times solution and 70% WeiErda Jiajituobujing WP 600 times solution on powdery mildew were the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WeiErda Jiajituobujing solution had among the best control effects.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
70% WeiErda Jiajituobujing WP 600 times solutione0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“control effect of 50% Yisheng WP 600 times solution and 70% WeiErda Jiajituobujing WP 600 times solution on powdery mildew were the best”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim had the worst powdery mildew control effect.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
50% carbendazim WP 1000 times solutione0
Outcome
control effecte1
Direction
worste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“50% carbendazim WP 1000 times solution was the worst”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“control effect of 50% Yisheng WP 600 times solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 9307 cultivar had superior mildew control response to Victoria after three sprays.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
‘9307’e0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Victoriae0

Verbatim

e0

“control effect of three chemicals after spraying three times on powdery mildew of the two grape cultivars, ‘9307’ was superior to Victoria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.