Paper · 2012 · North Rice

Study on Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region

Ding Liang

12
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The comparative test were made on control irrigation treatment,save irrigation treatment and conventional irrigation treatment.The results indicated that the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control,but it can't meet the needs for the rice growth which showed plant height was short 0.7 cm than control,the number of stems was lack 0.5 than control,grains per panicle was lack 1.8 than control and yield was 635.4 kg/667 m2 which reduce 6.5% than control.Save irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control,tha water can supply the needs for the rice growth,because of shallow water can increase water temperature and mud temperature,promote tillering,the number of stems was 19.6 which add 1.7 than control,the yield was 679.1 kg/667 m2,improving income 2.6 yuan/667 m2 and it had high value of market popularization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control irrigation saved 84 m3/667 m2 of water compared with control.

Treatment
control irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
water consumptione1
Direction
can savee1
Value
84 m3/667 m2e1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control irrigation made rice plant height 0.7 cm shorter than control.

Treatment
control irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
shorte2
Value
0.7 cme2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–268 · show in text ↑
e2

“plant height was short 0.7 cm than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control irrigation gave 0.5 fewer stems than control in rice.

Treatment
control irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
number of stemse3
Direction
lacke3
Value
0.5e3
Comparator
controle3
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–268 · show in text ↑
e3

“the number of stems was lack 0.5 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control irrigation gave 1.8 fewer grains per panicle than control in rice.

Treatment
control irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
grains per paniclee4
Direction
lacke4
Value
1.8e4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–268 · show in text ↑
e4

“grains per panicle was lack 1.8 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control irrigation reduced rice yield by 6.5% compared with control.

Treatment
control irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reducee5
Value
6.5%e5
Qualifier
635.4 kg/667 m2e5
Comparator
controle5
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–268 · show in text ↑
e5

“yield was 635.4 kg/667 m2 which reduce 6.5% than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Save irrigation saved 84 m3/667 m2 of water compared with control in rice.

Treatment
Save irrigation treatmente6
Outcome
water consumptione1
Direction
can savee6
Value
84 m3/667 m2e6
Comparator
controle6
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Save irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–611 · show in text ↑
e1

“the water consumption of control irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Save irrigation water could meet the needs of rice growth.

Treatment
Save irrigation treatmente6
Outcome
needs for the rice growthe7
Qualifier
tha water can supplye7
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Save irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–611 · show in text ↑
e7

“tha water can supply the needs for the rice growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Save irrigation gave 1.7 more stems than control in rice.

Treatment
Save irrigation treatmente6
Outcome
number of stemse2
Direction
adde2
Value
1.7e2
Qualifier
19.6e2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Save irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–611 · show in text ↑
e2

“promote tillering,the number of stems was 19.6 which add 1.7 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Save irrigation rice yield was 679.1 kg/667 m2.

Treatment
Save irrigation treatmente6
Outcome
yielde2
Value
679.1 kg/667 m2e2
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Save irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–611 · show in text ↑
e2

“the yield was 679.1 kg/667 m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Save irrigation improved rice income by 2.6 yuan/667 m2.

Treatment
Save irrigation treatmente6
Outcome
incomee2
Direction
improvinge2
Value
2.6 yuan/667 m2e2
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e6

“Save irrigation treatment was 296.4 m3/667 m2 which can save 84 m3/667 m2 than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–611 · show in text ↑
e2

“improving income 2.6 yuan/667 m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–875 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow water in save irrigation promotes rice tillering, because it raises water and mud temperature.

Treatment
shallow watere1
Outcome
tilleringe1
Qualifier
increase water temperature and mud temperaturee1
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“because of shallow water can increase water temperature and mud temperature,promote tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–756 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Save irrigation has high value for market popularization of rice.

Outcome
market popularizatione1
Qualifier
high valuee1
Setting
Cold Regiont0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Water Saving Irrigation Technology of Rice in Cold Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“it had high value of market popularization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–922 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.