Abstract
Maize Kenyu6 was used as indicator plant to study the herbicide antidote N- dichloroacetyl-2-methyl- 1-oxa-4- aza-spiro- 4.4-nonane on protecting maize residual injury from acetochlor by raising it in soil with acetochlor. The results of experiment showed the growths of maize were lower than comparison value. The antidote could protect maize injury from acetochlor differently after soaking maize with different concentration antidotes. The protection was the best when antidotes concentration was 8 mg/kg.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Maize growth was lower in acetochlor soil than the comparison value.
Zea maysNot reportedMaterial
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results of experiment showed the growths of maize were lower than comparison value.”
t0“Maize Residual Injury from Acetochlor”
Claim · model-written summary
Antidote soaking protected maize from acetochlor injury, with protection differing by concentration.
- Treatment
- soaking maize with different concentration antidotese0
- Outcome
- maize injury from acetochlore0
- Direction
- protecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The antidote could protect maize injury from acetochlor differently after soaking maize with different concentration antidotes.”
Claim · model-written summary
The best protection of maize from acetochlor injury occurred at an antidote concentration of 8 mg/kg.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The protection was the best when antidotes concentration was 8 mg/kg.”
t0“Maize Residual Injury from Acetochlor”
The same questions in other papers
antidote · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
acetochlor · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- no effect
antidote · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
application · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.