Paper · 2002 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Study on the annual balance application of nitrogen fertilizer in the system of wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut.

Kou Chang; Yong Wang

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

By adopting the double optimal value method, the annual optimal amount of nitrogen fertilizer and the ratio of nitrogen fertilizer distributed among crops in the system of wheat relay intercropping with corn and peanut is studied in sandy soil. The results show that the annual optimal total amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied in this system is 311.1 kg/hm2 and the suitable distributive proportion of the fertilizer is 33. 7:35. 1:31. 2 among the three crops. It indicates that the applying amounts are 104.8 kg/hm2 , 27.3kg/hm2 and 72.8kg/hm2 in natural area for wheat, corn and peanut respectively, and the annual amount fertilized is 204.9kg/hm2 per natural hectare. Though it decreases by 29.9% compared with the rate determined by conventional fertilization for each sole crop, the yields of wheat, corn and peanut and total yield gained increase by 9.3%, 3.7% , 4.8% and 6.3% respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The annual optimal nitrogen amount was 311.1 kg/hm2.

Outcome
annual optimal total amount of nitrogen fertilizere0
Value
311.1 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“the annual optimal total amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied in this system is 311.1 kg/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–360 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The suitable nitrogen distribution among wheat, corn and peanut was 33. 7:35. 1:31. 2.

Outcome
suitable distributive proportion of the fertilizere0
Value
33. 7:35. 1:31. 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“the suitable distributive proportion of the fertilizer is 33. 7:35. 1:31. 2 among the three crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–462 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The indicated nitrogen amount for wheat was 104.8 kg/hm2.

Outcome
applying amountse0
Value
104.8 kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the applying amounts are 104.8 kg/hm2 , 27.3kg/hm2 and 72.8kg/hm2 in natural area for wheat, corn and peanut respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The indicated nitrogen amount for corn was 27.3kg/hm2.

Outcome
applying amountse0
Value
27.3kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the applying amounts are 104.8 kg/hm2 , 27.3kg/hm2 and 72.8kg/hm2 in natural area for wheat, corn and peanut respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The indicated nitrogen amount for peanut was 72.8kg/hm2.

Outcome
applying amountse0
Value
72.8kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the applying amounts are 104.8 kg/hm2 , 27.3kg/hm2 and 72.8kg/hm2 in natural area for wheat, corn and peanut respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–603 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual nitrogen amount was 204.9kg/hm2 per natural hectare.

Outcome
annual amount fertilizede0
Value
204.9kg/hm2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“the annual amount fertilized is 204.9kg/hm2 per natural hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate decreased by 29.9% against conventional fertilization for each sole crop.

Treatment
annual amount fertilizede1
Outcome
ratee0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
29.9%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilization for each sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“it decreases by 29.9% compared with the rate determined by conventional fertilization for each sole crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–785 · show in text ↑
e1

“the annual amount fertilized is 204.9kg/hm2 per natural hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased by 9.3% against conventional sole-crop fertilization.

Treatment
wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanutt0
Outcome
yields of wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9.3%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilization for each sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Though it decreases by 29.9% compared with the rate determined by conventional fertilization for each sole crop, the yields of wheat, corn and peanut and total yield gained increase by 9.3%, 3.7% , 4.8% and 6.3% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield increased by 3.7% against conventional sole-crop fertilization.

Treatment
wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanutt0
Outcome
corne0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.7%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilization for each sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Though it decreases by 29.9% compared with the rate determined by conventional fertilization for each sole crop, the yields of wheat, corn and peanut and total yield gained increase by 9.3%, 3.7% , 4.8% and 6.3% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut yield increased by 4.8% against conventional sole-crop fertilization.

Treatment
wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanutt0
Outcome
peanute0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4.8%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilization for each sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Though it decreases by 29.9% compared with the rate determined by conventional fertilization for each sole crop, the yields of wheat, corn and peanut and total yield gained increase by 9.3%, 3.7% , 4.8% and 6.3% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield increased by 6.3% against conventional sole-crop fertilization.

Treatment
wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanutt0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.3%e0
Comparator
conventional fertilization for each sole crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat relay intercropped with corn and peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Though it decreases by 29.9% compared with the rate determined by conventional fertilization for each sole crop, the yields of wheat, corn and peanut and total yield gained increase by 9.3%, 3.7% , 4.8% and 6.3% respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–899 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Triticum aestivum · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Winter annual forage reduced subsequent corn silage yield.

    Integrating a Double‐Cropped Winter Annual Forage into a Corn‐Soybean Rotation · 2002 · compared with treatments thatdid not have a double‐crop winter annual forage

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 13 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Arachis hypogaea · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

intercropping · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

189 papers: 131 positive, 58 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

185 papers more in this group

See all 189 papers →

intercropping · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.