Abstract
Effect of different planting ratios of intercropping maize and peanut on Economical and Bio logical yield of maize ( Zea maize L.) was evaluated in the Department of Agronomy, University of Zabol, during 2011. The treatments were compared in a rando mized co mp letely b lock design (RCBD) with n ine planting ratios intercropping that were included. M : Sole maize var KSC 301(100% maize+0% peanut), M * : Sole maize var KSC 604 (100% maize+0% peanut), P: So le peanut (100%peanut + 0%maize), MP: Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 50% + peanut 50%, M * P: Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50%, mP: Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 25% + peanut 75%, m * P: Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 25% + peanut 75%, Mp : Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 75% + peanut 25%, M * p: Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 75% + peanut 25%. The intercropped of maize and peanut in different planting ratio significantly affected the quantitative characters of the yield. The highest dry biological yield of maize (57.3t/ha) was obtained by sowing the crops in Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 75% + peanut 25%. The highest grain yield (10.0 t/ha) for maize was recorded fro m Sole maize var KSC 604(100% maize+0% peanut) and the highest dry biological y ield for peanut (7.4 t/ha) was recorded fro m Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50%. The h ighest LER (2.30) and the lowest LER (1.27) was obtained by sowing the crops in ratio of Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50% and Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 25% + peanut 75% respectively. The results was shown that mixture were advantageous compared to both sole crops of maize and peanut.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Planting ratio significantly affected quantitative yield characters.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)
Arachis hypogaea
Zea mayst0 - Treatment
- different planting ratioe0
- Outcome
- quantitative characters of the yielde0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropped of maize and peanut in different planting ratio significantly affected the quantitative characters of the yield”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize dry biological yield peaked at 57.3t/ha with KSC 604 at 75% and peanut at 25%.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
- Material
- KSC 604e0
- Treatment
- Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 75% + peanut 25%e0
- Outcome
- dry biological yield of maizee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 57.3t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest dry biological yield of maize (57.3t/ha) was obtained by sowing the crops in Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 75% + peanut 25%”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain yield peaked at 10.0 t/ha under sole KSC 604 cropping.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
- Material
- KSC 604e0
- Treatment
- Sole maize var KSC 604(100% maize+0% peanut)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 10.0 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest grain yield (10.0 t/ha) for maize was recorded fro m Sole maize var KSC 604(100% maize+0% peanut)”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Peanut dry biological yield peaked at 7.4 t/ha with KSC 604 maize at 50% and peanut at 50%.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
- Material
- KSC 604e0
- Treatment
- Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50%e0
- Outcome
- dry biological y ield for peanute0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 7.4 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the highest dry biological y ield for peanut (7.4 t/ha) was recorded fro m Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50%”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest LER was 2.30 at a KSC 604 maize and peanut 50:50 ratio.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
- Material
- KSC 604e0
- Treatment
- Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50%e0
- Outcome
- LERe0
- Direction
- h igheste0
- Value
- 2.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The h ighest LER (2.30) and the lowest LER (1.27) was obtained by sowing the crops in ratio of Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50% and Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 25% + peanut 75% respectively”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest LER was 1.27 at a KSC 301 maize 25% and peanut 75% ratio.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
- Material
- KSC 301e0
- Treatment
- Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 25% + peanut 75%e0
- Outcome
- LERe0
- Direction
- loweste0
- Value
- 1.27e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The h ighest LER (2.30) and the lowest LER (1.27) was obtained by sowing the crops in ratio of Intercrop of maize var KSC 604 50% + peanut 50% and Intercrop of maize var KSC 301 25% + peanut 75% respectively”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixtures had an advantage over both sole crops.
- Taxon
- Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)Arachis hypogaeaZea mayst0
- Treatment
- mixturee0
- Outcome
- advantageouse0
- Direction
- advantageouse0
- Comparator
- both sole crops of maize and peanute0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mixture were advantageous compared to both sole crops of maize and peanut”
t0“Maize (Zea mays L.) and Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Arachis hypogaea · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →Zea mays · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Arachis hypogaea · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →intercropping · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- negative
115 papers more in this group
See all 119 papers →intercropping · organism · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →intercropping · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →intercropping · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
612 papers in the same direction as this paper · 181 in the opposite direction · 40 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
830 papers more in this group
See all 834 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.