Paper · 2010 · Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences

Comparison of Comprehensive Benefit of Transplanting Cotton after Wheat Harvest and Wheat-cotton Intercropping

Yao Hua-sheng

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The comprehensive benefit of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest and wheat-cotton intercropping were compared.The results showed that the yield of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest decreased by 9.79%,while that of wheat increased by 42.86% than that of wheat-cotton intercropping,and the direct benefit increased 1 978 yuan/hm2.That was to say,the pattern of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest could not only ensure food safety,but also stabilize the production of cotton,solve the contradiction of land use between food crops and cotton,and liberate the labor,which was worth spreading.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield after wheat harvest decreased 9.79% compared with intercropping.

Treatment
transplanting cotton after wheat harveste0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
9.79%e0
Comparator
wheat-cotton intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest decreased by 9.79%,while that of wheat increased by 42.86% than that of wheat-cotton intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased 42.86% in the transplanting pattern compared with intercropping.

Treatment
transplanting cotton after wheat harveste0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42.86%e0
Comparator
wheat-cotton intercroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest decreased by 9.79%,while that of wheat increased by 42.86% than that of wheat-cotton intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct benefit increased by 1 978 yuan/hm2 under the transplanting pattern.

Treatment
transplanting cotton after wheat harveste0
Outcome
direct benefite2
Direction
increasede2
Value
1 978 yuan/hm2e2
Comparator
wheat-cotton intercroppinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The comprehensive benefit of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest and wheat-cotton intercropping were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
e1

“transplanting cotton after wheat harvest and wheat-cotton intercropping were compared.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 29–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“the direct benefit increased 1 978 yuan/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–339 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend transplanting cotton after wheat harvest.

Outcome
the pattern of transplanting cotton after wheat harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the pattern of transplanting cotton after wheat harvest could not only ensure food safety,but also stabilize the production of cotton,solve the contradiction of land use between food crops and cotton,and liberate the labor,which was worth spreading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–605 · show in text ↑

Gossypium hirsutum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Triticum aestivum · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

transplanting · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 39 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.