Paper · 2011

Effects of ozone stress on diurnal change of winter wheat photosynthesis at milking stage

HU Cheng-da

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

By using open top chamber,a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of elevated ozone concentration on the diurnal change of winter wheat photosynthesis at milking stage.At 13:00-15:00,the field environmental variables (photosynthetic active radiation,chamber temperature,and vapor pressure difference) were the menace to the winter wheat photosynthesis.Comparing with the control,fumigation with 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone led to the decrease of net photosynthetic rate by 6.3% and 11.1%,respectively (P0.05).In treatment 100 nl·L-1 of ozone,the stoma limit value,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance,and water use efficiency had a change trend basically in accordance with that in control;whereas in treatment 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance increased significantly before 11:00,but the water use efficiency was in adverse.At 13:00-15:00,the water use efficiency increased significantly in both cases.The above evidences indicated that under no environmental stress,the decrease of net photosynthetic rate could be attributed to the stomatal and non-stomatal limitation in treatments 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,respectively.Under stressed environment,both 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone improved the winter wheat water use efficiency significantly,moreover,150 nl·L-1 of ozone induced a significant increase of intercellular CO2 use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental variables threatened winter wheat photosynthesis at 13:00-15:00.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
winter wheat photosynthesise0
Qualifier
13:00-15:00e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 13:00-15:00,the field environmental variables (photosynthetic active radiation,chamber temperature,and vapor pressure difference) were the menace to the winter wheat photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone at 100 nl·L-1 decreased net photosynthetic rate by 6.3% versus control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100 nl·L-1 of ozonee1
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
6.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with the control,fumigation with 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone led to the decrease of net photosynthetic rate by 6.3% and 11.1%,respectively (P0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment 100 nl·L-1 of ozone,the stoma limit value,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance,and water use efficiency had a change trend basically in accordance with that in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone at 150 nl·L-1 decreased net photosynthetic rate by 11.1% versus control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
150 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
11.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing with the control,fumigation with 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone led to the decrease of net photosynthetic rate by 6.3% and 11.1%,respectively (P0.05).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 nl·L-1 ozone, stomatal limitation, transpiration, conductance and water use efficiency followed control trends.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
stoma limit value,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance,and water use efficiencye0
Direction
in accordance withe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In treatment 100 nl·L-1 of ozone,the stoma limit value,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance,and water use efficiency had a change trend basically in accordance with that in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–706 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 nl·L-1 ozone, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance increased before 11:00.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
150 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
transpiration rate and stomatal conductancee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
before 11:00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in treatment 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance increased significantly before 11:00”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 nl·L-1 ozone, water use efficiency showed the adverse trend before 11:00.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
150 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in treatment 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,the transpiration rate and stomatal conductance increased significantly before 11:00,but the water use efficiency was in adverse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency increased significantly at 13:00-15:00 in both ozone treatments.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
both casese0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
13:00-15:00e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 13:00-15:00,the water use efficiency increased significantly in both cases.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–955 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100 nl·L-1 ozone without environmental stress, authors attributed lower photosynthesis to stomatal limitation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
100 nl·L-1 of ozonee1
Outcome
decrease of net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
stomatale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under no environmental stress,the decrease of net photosynthetic rate could be attributed to the stomatal and non-stomatal limitation in treatments 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment 100 nl·L-1 of ozone,the stoma limit value,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance,and water use efficiency had a change trend basically in accordance with that in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–706 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 nl·L-1 ozone without environmental stress, authors attributed lower photosynthesis to non-stomatal limitation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
150 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
decrease of net photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
non-stomatal limitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under no environmental stress,the decrease of net photosynthetic rate could be attributed to the stomatal and non-stomatal limitation in treatments 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stressed environment, 100 nl·L-1 ozone significantly improved water use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
100 nl·L-1 of ozonee1
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stressed environment,both 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone improved the winter wheat water use efficiency significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“In treatment 100 nl·L-1 of ozone,the stoma limit value,transpiration rate,stomatal conductance,and water use efficiency had a change trend basically in accordance with that in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stressed environment, 150 nl·L-1 ozone significantly improved water use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
150 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stressed environment,both 100 and 150 nl·L-1 of ozone improved the winter wheat water use efficiency significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 150 nl·L-1 ozone, intercellular CO2 use efficiency increased significantly.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
150 nl·L-1 of ozonee0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 use efficiencye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150 nl·L-1 of ozone induced a significant increase of intercellular CO2 use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–57 · show in text ↑

ozone · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

47 papers: 2 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

ozone · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

ozone · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 1 positive, 14 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.