Abstract
A study was conducted to assess the feasibility of permanent shade net structure in comparison to open field condition for round the year cultivation. Experiment was conducted during 2016-2017 for winter, summer and rainy season. The microclimate parameters recorded were maximum and minimum temperature, light intensity and dry bulb and wet bulb temperature. The results showed that shade net lowered the temperature, light intensity and increased the relative humidity during winter, summer and rainy season in comparison to open field condition. The crops taken during round the year were i.e. winter season (pea, cabbage, cauliflower, and potato), summer season (tomato) and rainy season (spinach and coriander). During winter season under shade net structure only cabbage yield was better than open field and tomato yield during summer season under shade net structure was substantial higher than open field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Shade net lowered temperature relative to open field in all three seasons.
- Treatment
- shade nete0
- Outcome
- temperaturee0
- Direction
- lowerede0
- Qualifier
- during winter, summer and rainy seasone0
- Comparator
- open field conditione0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“shade net lowered the temperature, light intensity and increased the relative humidity during winter, summer and rainy season in comparison to open field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Shade net lowered light intensity relative to open field in all three seasons.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“shade net lowered the temperature, light intensity and increased the relative humidity during winter, summer and rainy season in comparison to open field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Shade net increased relative humidity relative to open field in all three seasons.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“shade net lowered the temperature, light intensity and increased the relative humidity during winter, summer and rainy season in comparison to open field condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Shade net improved cabbage yield in winter relative to open field.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- shade net structuree0
- Outcome
- cabbage yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- winter seasone0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“During winter season under shade net structure only cabbage yield was better than open field”
Claim · model-written summary
Shade net substantially increased tomato yield in summer relative to open field.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- shade net structuree0
- Outcome
- tomato yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- summer seasone0
- Comparator
- open fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“tomato yield during summer season under shade net structure was substantial higher than open field”
The same questions in other papers
shade · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →shade · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →trap barrier · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →trap barrier · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.