Paper · 2015 · Zhongguo shuidao kexue

Photosynthetic Characteristics of Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching and Continuous Flooding

Wang Zhi-ju

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Photosynthetic pigments contents,photosynthetic characteristics,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,osmolytes,and water use efficiency(WUE)and yield factors at milky stage of two rice lines T-04 and T-43(Oryza sativa subsp.keng)were analyzed under traditional continuous flooding and drip irrigation with plastic film mulching in apot experiment.The results showed that the WUE of rice under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching were higher than that under traditional flooding,but chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and carotenoids contents were significantly reduced compared with those under traditional continuous flooding.The maximum leaf net photosynthetic rate,relatively high intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci)and an equivalent stomatal conductance(GS),transpiration rate(Tr)were significantly lower than those under continuous flooding,indicating that the reduced photosynthetic rate was attributed to both chlorophyll contents and stoma.Apparent quantum efficiency(AQY),carboxylation efficiency(CE),ΦPSⅡ,electron transport rate(ETR)and Fv/Fmdecreased significantly(P0.05).Lower photosynthetic pigments contents might be the main factor to low leaf photosynthetic rate which directly leads to 1ower light-harvesting capacity and photochemical conversion efficiencies of the PSⅡ reaction center.The contents of soluble sugars(SS)and soluble proteins(SP)were lower,but both proline(Pro)and malondialdehyde(MDA)contents were higher than those under continuous flooding cultivation,implicating that drip irrigation with plastic film mulching resulted in membrane lipid peroxidation,and cell membrane damage to some degree,but activated osmolytes accumulation thus enhanced its drought tolerance.Effective panicle number per unit area and seed setting rate under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching were significantly reduced,leading to a declined seed production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was higher under drip irrigation with film mulching.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
traditional floodinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WUE of rice under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching were higher than that under traditional flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid contents were significantly reduced versus flooding.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic film mulchingt0
Outcome
chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and carotenoids contentse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
traditional continuous floodinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and carotenoids contents were significantly reduced compared with those under traditional continuous flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum leaf net photosynthetic rate was significantly lower than under flooding.

Treatment
Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulchingt0
Outcome
maximum leaf net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
continuous floodinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum leaf net photosynthetic rate,relatively high intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci)and an equivalent stomatal conductance(GS),transpiration rate(Tr)were significantly lower than those under continuous flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO2 concentration, stomatal conductance and transpiration were significantly lower than under flooding.

Treatment
Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulchingt0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci)and an equivalent stomatal conductance(GS),transpiration rate(Tr)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
continuous floodinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum leaf net photosynthetic rate,relatively high intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci)and an equivalent stomatal conductance(GS),transpiration rate(Tr)were significantly lower than those under continuous flooding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparent quantum efficiency, carboxylation efficiency and ΦPSⅡ decreased significantly.

Treatment
Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulchingt0
Outcome
Apparent quantum efficiency(AQY),carboxylation efficiency(CE),ΦPSⅡe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent quantum efficiency(AQY),carboxylation efficiency(CE),ΦPSⅡ,electron transport rate(ETR)and Fv/Fmdecreased significantly(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Electron transport rate and Fv/Fm decreased significantly.

Treatment
Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulchingt0
Outcome
electron transport rate(ETR)and Fv/Fme0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apparent quantum efficiency(AQY),carboxylation efficiency(CE),ΦPSⅡ,electron transport rate(ETR)and Fv/Fmdecreased significantly(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar and soluble protein contents were lower than under flooding.

Treatment
Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulchingt0
Outcome
soluble sugars(SS)and soluble proteins(SP)e0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
continuous flooding cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of soluble sugars(SS)and soluble proteins(SP)were lower,but both proline(Pro)and malondialdehyde(MDA)contents were higher than those under continuous flooding cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and malondialdehyde contents were higher than under flooding.

Treatment
Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulchingt0
Outcome
proline(Pro)and malondialdehyde(MDA)contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
continuous flooding cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of soluble sugars(SS)and soluble proteins(SP)were lower,but both proline(Pro)and malondialdehyde(MDA)contents were higher than those under continuous flooding cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed lower photosynthetic rate to reduced pigment and stomatal factors.

Outcome
reduced photosynthetic ratee0
Qualifier
both chlorophyll contents and stomae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced photosynthetic rate was attributed to both chlorophyll contents and stoma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower pigment content was proposed to reduce light harvesting and PSⅡ conversion efficiency.

Outcome
1ower light-harvesting capacity and photochemical conversion efficiencies of the PSⅡ reaction centere0
Qualifier
Lower photosynthetic pigments contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower photosynthetic pigments contents might be the main factor to low leaf photosynthetic rate which directly leads to 1ower light-harvesting capacity and photochemical conversion efficiencies of the PSⅡ reaction center”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred membrane lipid peroxidation and cell membrane damage under drip irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
membrane lipid peroxidation,and cell membrane damagee0
Qualifier
to some degreee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation with plastic film mulching resulted in membrane lipid peroxidation,and cell membrane damage to some degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1626 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred osmolyte accumulation and enhanced drought tolerance under drip irrigation.

Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
osmolytes accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activated osmolytes accumulation thus enhanced its drought tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective panicle number and seed setting rate were significantly reduced under drip irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
Effective panicle number per unit area and seed setting ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effective panicle number per unit area and seed setting rate under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1836 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed production declined under drip irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigation with plastic film mulchinge0
Outcome
seed productione0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed setting rate under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching were significantly reduced,leading to a declined seed production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–38 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

irrigation · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

mulching · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

mulching · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 21 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 34 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.