Paper · 2005 · Xibei Nong-Lin Keji Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban

Study of several fungicides to control gray mold on tomato

Chunyan Liu

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Gray mold has already became one of the most important factors to affect vegetables recently.In this paper,several fungicides have been examined the inhibitory activities in vitro and the control effects in field tests.The results show,the value of EC_50 about 25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP is 0.27,3.21,0.99,4.14,169.49 and 12.59 μg/mL.The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25% Junsiqi EC had EC50 of 0.27 μg/mL against gray mold in vitro.

Treatment
25% Junsiqi ECe0
Outcome
EC_50e0
Value
0.27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the value of EC_50 about 25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP is 0.27,3.21,0.99,4.14,169.49 and 12.59 μg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrimethanil 40 SC had EC50 of 3.21 μg/mL in vitro.

Treatment
Pyrimethanil 40 SCe0
Outcome
EC_50e0
Value
3.21e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the value of EC_50 about 25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP is 0.27,3.21,0.99,4.14,169.49 and 12.59 μg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diethofencarb 50 WP had EC50 of 4.14 μg/mL in vitro.

Treatment
diethofencarb 50 WPe0
Outcome
EC_50e0
Value
4.14e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the value of EC_50 about 25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP is 0.27,3.21,0.99,4.14,169.49 and 12.59 μg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% carbendazim WP had EC50 of 169.49 μg/mL in vitro.

Treatment
50% carbendazim WPe0
Outcome
EC_50e0
Value
169.49e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the value of EC_50 about 25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP is 0.27,3.21,0.99,4.14,169.49 and 12.59 μg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% thiram WP had EC50 of 12.59 μg/mL in vitro.

Treatment
50% thiram WPe0
Outcome
EC_50e0
Value
12.59 μg/mLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the value of EC_50 about 25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP is 0.27,3.21,0.99,4.14,169.49 and 12.59 μg/mL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

25% Junsiqi EC controlled tomato gray mold in the field with 85.32% efficiency.

Treatment
25% Junsiqi ECe1
Outcome
control efficiency for tomato gray molde0
Value
85.32%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrimethanil 40 SC controlled tomato gray mold in the field with 83.65% efficiency.

Treatment
Pyrimethanil 40 SCe1
Outcome
control efficiency for tomato gray molde0
Value
83.65%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

20% procymidone WP controlled tomato gray mold in the field with 79.95% efficiency.

Treatment
20% procymidone WPe1
Outcome
control efficiency for tomato gray molde0
Value
79.95%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diethofencarb 50 WP controlled tomato gray mold in the field with 82.29% efficiency.

Treatment
diethofencarb 50 WPe1
Outcome
control efficiency for tomato gray molde0
Value
82.29%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% carbendazim WP controlled tomato gray mold in the field with 75.32% efficiency.

Treatment
50% carbendazim WPe1
Outcome
control efficiency for tomato gray molde0
Value
75.32%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

50% thiram WP controlled tomato gray mold in the field with 70.49% efficiency.

Treatment
50% thiram WPe1
Outcome
control efficiency for tomato gray molde0
Value
70.49%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency for tomato gray mold is 85.32%,83.65%,79.95%,82.29%,75.32% and 70.49% in field respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“25% Junsiqi EC,Pyrimethanil 40 SC,20% procymidone WP,diethofencarb 50 WP,50% carbendazim WP,50% thiram WP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–366 · show in text ↑

diethofencarb · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

pyrimethanil · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

carbendazim · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.