Paper · 2009 · Hubei nongye kexue

Fruit Quality Change of Delayed Harvested Citrus under Protected Cultivation

HU Jun-qing

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The development of fruit and changes of quality in the plastic house and open-field were studied using okitsu satsuma mandarin as material.The results showed that the fruit coloring was delayed in protected cultivation;the quality of the fruits with moderate drought treatment was better;total soluble solid content(TSS) of the treatment was 1.3% higher than that of CK,the decreasing speed of titratable acid(TA) under this treatment was faster,titratable acid content was 0.07% lower than CK,the glucose and fructose content of the fruit under moderate drought treatment increased while that of other treatment decreased at later stage.The spraying of GA3+Ca(CH3COO)2 could control the puffiness effectively.The percentage of puffiness was less than 5%,and it was 10% lower than CK.The harvest time could delay 1~2 months under protected cultivation according to the experiment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected cultivation delayed citrus fruit coloring.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
protected cultivatione0
Outcome
fruit coloringe0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the fruit coloring was delayed in protected cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought improved citrus fruit quality.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
moderate drought treatmente0
Outcome
quality of the fruitse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the quality of the fruits with moderate drought treatment was better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought raised fruit total soluble solids by 1.3% versus CK.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
moderate drought treatmente1
Outcome
total soluble solid content(TSS)e0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.3%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“total soluble solid content(TSS) of the treatment was 1.3% higher than that of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–369 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits with moderate drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought accelerated the decline in fruit titratable acid.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
moderate drought treatmente1
Outcome
decreasing speed of titratable acid(TA)e0
Direction
fastere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the decreasing speed of titratable acid(TA) under this treatment was faster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–445 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits with moderate drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate drought lowered titratable acid content by 0.07% versus CK.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
moderate drought treatmente1
Outcome
titratable acid contente0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.07%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“titratable acid content was 0.07% lower than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits with moderate drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit glucose and fructose content increased under moderate drought but decreased under other treatment at the later stage.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
moderate drought treatmente0
Outcome
glucose and fructose content of the fruite0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at later stagee0
Comparator
other treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“the glucose and fructose content of the fruit under moderate drought treatment increased while that of other treatment decreased at later stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying GA3+Ca(CH3COO)2 lowered fruit puffiness to less than 5%, 10% below CK.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
spraying of GA3+Ca(CH3COO)2e0
Outcome
percentage of puffinesse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
less than 5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The spraying of GA3+Ca(CH3COO)2 could control the puffiness effectively.The percentage of puffiness was less than 5%,and it was 10% lower than CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected cultivation allowed harvest to be delayed 1~2 months.

Taxon
CitrusCitrust0
Treatment
protected cultivatione0
Outcome
harvest timee0
Direction
delaye0
Value
1~2 monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Citrus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–48 · show in text ↑
e0

“The harvest time could delay 1~2 months under protected cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–851 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · CitrusResults differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cultivation system · yield · CitrusPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · CitrusPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · quality: general · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.