Abstract

Embryo abortion stage and rescue system of hybrids iwere studied in the distant hybridization between plum and apricot. Identification of the hybrids was also made. The results showed: Embryo abortion started from three weeks after pollination; The germination and growth of embryos were different at different growth stages, which could germinate and grow with PF value0.5, but can not with PF value0.5; In embryo rescue system of hybrids, the best germination and differentiation medium was MS + 6-BA 2 mg·L-1 + IAA 0.3 mg·L-1, the rate of germination and differentiation reached up to 80%, buds induction and multiplication medium was MS+ 6-BA 1.5 mg·L-1 + IAA 0.3 mg-L-1, rooting medium was 1/2 MS + IAA 0.8 mg·L-1. Some hybrids were transplanted into the field successfully; Leaf shape investigation and identification by S allele-specific PCR and RAPDs showed that the hybrids were true ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid embryo abortion started three weeks after pollination.

Outcome
Embryo abortione0
Value
three weeks after pollinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Embryo abortion started from three weeks after pollination;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryo germination and growth varied with growth stage; the reported PF threshold is internally contradictory.

Outcome
germination and growth of embryose0
Qualifier
different at different growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination and growth of embryos were different at different growth stages, which could germinate and grow with PF value0.5, but can not with PF value0.5;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best embryo germination and differentiation medium reached up to 80%.

Treatment
MS + 6-BA 2 mg·L-1 + IAA 0.3 mg·L-1e0
Outcome
rate of germination and differentiatione0
Direction
reached up toe0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best germination and differentiation medium was MS + 6-BA 2 mg·L-1 + IAA 0.3 mg·L-1, the rate of germination and differentiation reached up to 80%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The identified bud induction and multiplication medium was MS with 6-BA and IAA.

Treatment
MS+ 6-BA 1.5 mg·L-1 + IAA 0.3 mg-L-1e0
Outcome
buds induction and multiplication mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“buds induction and multiplication medium was MS+ 6-BA 1.5 mg·L-1 + IAA 0.3 mg-L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The identified rooting medium was half-strength MS with IAA.

Treatment
1/2 MS + IAA 0.8 mg·L-1e0
Outcome
rooting mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rooting medium was 1/2 MS + IAA 0.8 mg·L-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some hybrids were successfully transplanted to the field.

Outcome
hybrids were transplanted into the field successfullye0
Setting
the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Some hybrids were transplanted into the field successfully;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf shape and molecular marker identification confirmed the hybrids.

Outcome
hybrids were true onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf shape investigation and identification by S allele-specific PCR and RAPDs showed that the hybrids were true ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Creating New Germplasm by Distant Hybridization in Stone FruitsII. Embryo Rescue and Hybrid Identification Between Plum and Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.