Abstract
Three dosages of the Tolfenpyrad 15%EC viz;100, 125 and 150 g along with two treated checks ie., imidacloprid 17.85 SL @ 22.5 g and acetamiprid 20%WP@ 20 g a.i./ha and untreated check were evaluated against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius in okra during rabi and kharif 2008–2009. All the treatments were significantly superior over untreated check. The tolfenpyrad @ 150 g. a. i./ha gave maximum reduction, 92.66 to 99.22 and 93.10 to 98.61 per cent, in population over control during rabi and kharif, respectively. The data on mean whitefly population in all treatment during two seasons revealed that the least whitefly count were recorded in tolfenpyrad 15%@ 150 g. a. i./ha was followed by imidacloprid 17.85 SL@22.5 g. a.i./ha and acetamiprid 20%WP@20 g. a.i./ha. Lowest reduction in whitefly population (11.15 to 18.02 and 15.98 to 46.71 per cent) was recorded in tolfenpyrad 100 g. a. i./ha at 3rd and 7th days after spray in both seasons, respectively. The natural enemies fauna in okra ecosystem had non significant differences among treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
All treatments reduced whitefly relative to untreated check significantly.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- All the treatmentse0
- Interactor
- whiteflyt0pest
- Outcome
- superiore0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- untreated checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All the treatments were significantly superior over untreated check.”
t0“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Tolfenpyrad at 150 g gave 92.66 to 99.22 per cent population reduction in rabi.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- tolfenpyrad @ 150 g. a. i./hae0
- Interactor
- whiteflyt0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Direction
- maximum reductione0
- Value
- 92.66 to 99.22e0
- Qualifier
- rabie0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tolfenpyrad @ 150 g. a. i./ha gave maximum reduction, 92.66 to 99.22 and 93.10 to 98.61 per cent, in population over control during rabi and kharif, respectively.”
t0“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Tolfenpyrad at 150 g gave 93.10 to 98.61 per cent population reduction in kharif.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- tolfenpyrad @ 150 g. a. i./hae0
- Interactor
- whiteflyt0pest
- Outcome
- populatione0
- Direction
- maximum reductione0
- Value
- 93.10 to 98.61 per cente0
- Qualifier
- kharife0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The tolfenpyrad @ 150 g. a. i./ha gave maximum reduction, 92.66 to 99.22 and 93.10 to 98.61 per cent, in population over control during rabi and kharif, respectively.”
t0“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Tolfenpyrad 150 g produced the least whitefly count among treatments.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- tolfenpyrad 15%@ 150 g. a. i./hae0
- Outcome
- whitefly counte0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Comparator
- imidacloprid 17.85 SL@22.5 g. a.i./ha and acetamiprid 20%WP@20 g. a.i./hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the least whitefly count were recorded in tolfenpyrad 15%@ 150 g. a. i./ha was followed by imidacloprid 17.85 SL@22.5 g. a.i./ha and acetamiprid 20%WP@20 g. a.i./ha.”
t0“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Tolfenpyrad 100 g yielded the lowest reduction of whitefly, 11.15 to 18.02 per cent.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- tolfenpyrad 100 g. a. i./hae0
- Outcome
- whitefly populatione0
- Direction
- Lowest reductione0
- Value
- 11.15 to 18.02e0
- Qualifier
- 3rd and 7th days after spraye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowest reduction in whitefly population (11.15 to 18.02 and 15.98 to 46.71 per cent) was recorded in tolfenpyrad 100 g. a. i./ha at 3rd and 7th days after spray in both seasons, respectively.”
t0“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Tolfenpyrad 100 g yielded the lowest reduction of whitefly, 15.98 to 46.71 per cent in the other season.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- tolfenpyrad 100 g. a. i./hae0
- Outcome
- whitefly populatione0
- Direction
- Lowest reductione0
- Value
- 15.98 to 46.71 per cente0
- Qualifier
- both seasonse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowest reduction in whitefly population (11.15 to 18.02 and 15.98 to 46.71 per cent) was recorded in tolfenpyrad 100 g. a. i./ha at 3rd and 7th days after spray in both seasons, respectively.”
t0“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Natural enemy fauna did not differ significantly among treatments.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentuse0
- Treatment
- treatmentse0
- Outcome
- natural enemies faunae0
- Direction
- non significant differencese0
- Comparator
- among treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The natural enemies fauna in okra ecosystem had non significant differences among treatments.”
The same questions in other papers
tolfenpyrad · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.