Paper · 2013 · HortScience

Effects of Rapid Consecutive Postharvest 1-Methylcyclopropene Treatments on Fruit Quality and Storage Disorders in Apples

Jennifer DeEll; Behrouz Ehsani-Moghaddam

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of rapid consecutive 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatments on apple quality and disorders in storage. ‘McIntosh’ and ‘Spartan’ apples were harvested twice from commercial orchards and 1-MCP (1 μL·L −1 ) was applied postharvest either 1 day after harvest or 1 and 2 days after harvest. Similar fruit from both cultivars were also not treated with 1-MCP, plus an additional treatment of 2 μL·L −1 (double rate) 1-MCP was used on ‘McIntosh’. Fruit were held in either air storage at 0.5 °C for three or six months or in controlled-atmosphere (CA) storage for six or nine months. Overall, 1-MCP treatment improved firmness and acidity retention and reduced internal ethylene in both cultivars. However, ‘Spartan’ stored in CA often maintained these attributes without 1-MCP. ‘McIntosh’ apples treated twice with 1-MCP were often firmer than those treated just once. All 1-MCP treatments substantially reduced superficial scald and there was no difference in scald incidence among the treatments. Core browning was generally reduced by 1-MCP, but fruit treated once with 2 μL·L −1 or twice with 1 μL·L −1 1-MCP sometimes had higher incidence than fruit treated only once with 1 μL·L −1 . ‘Spartan’ treated twice with 1-MCP also had higher incidence of internal browning after nine months. 1-MCP increased the incidence of external CO 2 injury in ‘McIntosh’ from the first harvest, with fruit treated with 2 μL·L −1 having the highest incidence after six months of CA storage and those treated once with 1 μL·L −1 having the highest incidence after nine months. Storage rots were greatest after six months of air storage and 1-MCP treatments usually reduced the incidence, regardless of treatment. These results suggest that using more than the traditional single application of 1 μL·L −1 1-MCP may improve firmness retention, but there is also some risk associated with increased disorders, especially when storing apples long-term, such as for six months in air or nine months in CA storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP improved apple firmness and acidity retention.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
firmness and acidity retentione0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Overall, 1-MCP treatment improved firmness and acidity retention and reduced internal ethylene in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced internal ethylene in both apple cultivars.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
internal ethylenee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Overall, 1-MCP treatment improved firmness and acidity retention and reduced internal ethylene in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spartan apples in controlled-atmosphere storage often maintained quality attributes without 1-MCP.

Material
‘Spartan’e0
Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
these attributese0
Comparator
without 1-MCPe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Spartan’ stored in CA often maintained these attributes without 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–830 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-treated McIntosh apples were often firmer than once-treated apples.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
treated twice with 1-MCPe0
Outcome
firmere0
Direction
firmere0
Comparator
treated just oncee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘McIntosh’ apples treated twice with 1-MCP were often firmer than those treated just once”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–921 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All 1-MCP treatments reduced superficial scald.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmentse0
Outcome
superficial scalde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“All 1-MCP treatments substantially reduced superficial scald and there was no difference in scald incidence among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scald incidence did not differ among the 1-MCP treatments.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmentse0
Outcome
scald incidencee0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“All 1-MCP treatments substantially reduced superficial scald and there was no difference in scald incidence among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP generally reduced core browning.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
Core browninge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Core browning was generally reduced by 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1097 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

once with 2 μL·L −1 sometimes increased core browning incidence relative to a single standard application.

Treatment
once with 2 μL·L −1e0
Outcome
higher incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
once with 1 μL·L −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit treated once with 2 μL·L −1 or twice with 1 μL·L −1 1-MCP sometimes had higher incidence than fruit treated only once with 1 μL·L −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

twice with 1 μL·L −1 1-MCP sometimes increased core browning incidence relative to a single standard application.

Treatment
twice with 1 μL·L −1 1-MCPe0
Outcome
higher incidencee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
once with 1 μL·L −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit treated once with 2 μL·L −1 or twice with 1 μL·L −1 1-MCP sometimes had higher incidence than fruit treated only once with 1 μL·L −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice-treated Spartan apples had higher internal browning incidence after nine months.

Material
‘Spartan’e0
Treatment
treated twice with 1-MCPe0
Outcome
internal browninge0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after nine monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Spartan’ treated twice with 1-MCP also had higher incidence of internal browning after nine months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP increased external CO2 injury in first-harvest McIntosh apples.

Material
‘McIntosh’e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
external CO 2 injurye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
from the first harveste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“1-MCP increased the incidence of external CO 2 injury in ‘McIntosh’ from the first harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

External CO2 injury incidence was highest for 2 μL·L −1 after six months of CA storage.

Treatment
2 μL·L −1e0
Outcome
highest incidencee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after six months of CA storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit treated with 2 μL·L −1 having the highest incidence after six months of CA storage and those treated once with 1 μL·L −1 having the highest incidence after nine months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

External CO2 injury incidence was highest for once with 1 μL·L −1 after nine months.

Treatment
once with 1 μL·L −1e0
Outcome
highest incidencee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after nine monthse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“fruit treated with 2 μL·L −1 having the highest incidence after six months of CA storage and those treated once with 1 μL·L −1 having the highest incidence after nine months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage rots were greatest after six months in air storage.

Treatment
six months of air storagee0
Outcome
Storage rotse0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Storage rots were greatest after six months of air storage and 1-MCP treatments usually reduced the incidence, regardless of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP treatments usually reduced storage rot incidence.

Treatment
1-MCP treatmentse0
Outcome
Storage rotse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Storage rots were greatest after six months of air storage and 1-MCP treatments usually reduced the incidence, regardless of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1617–1751 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

49 papers: 33 positive, 16 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · crop injury · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.