Paper · 2012

PENGARUH INTERVAL WAKTU PEMBERIAN PUPUK ORGANIK CAIR ENVIRO TERHADAP PERTUMBUHAN DAN HASIL DUA VARIETAS MENTIMUN (Cucumis sativus L.) Effects of Provision Time Interval of Organic Liquid Fertilizer Enviro on Growth and Yield of Two Varieties of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Prodi Agroteknologi Fakultas Pertanian

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was aimed at determining appropriate time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviro to growth and yield of two varieties of cucumber and interaction betweenthe time interval and the variety. The experiment was carried out on flood plain of Krueng Lamnyong, Shiah Kuala Sub District, Banda Aceh from November 2008 to January 2009, using a factorial randomized complete block design 4x2 with three replications. Factors studied were time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviro, consisting of 4 levels ( 5, 7, 9 and 11 days and varieties, consisting of 2 levels (local varieties and Hercules 56). Variables observed were plant height, fruit numbers, fruit length, fruit diameter, and fruit Weights. Results showed that the time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviro did not affect plant height at age of 10, 20, and 30 days after planting (DAP), the number, length, diameter and weight of cucumber fruits harvested for 4 times. On the other hand, variety exerted significant effects on plant height at age of 10, 20 and 30 DAP, the number, length and weight of fruits, but did not exert a significant effect on fruit diameter. The best growth and length of cucumber fruits were found on varieties Hercules 56, while the number, diameter and weight of fruits of four Time harvest were found on local varieties. There was no significant interaction between time interval and variety on all variables observed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer interval did not affect cucumber height at 10, 20 or 30 days after planting.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviroe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
10, 20, and 30 days after planting (DAP)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviro did not affect plant height at age of 10, 20, and 30 days after planting (DAP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer interval did not affect cucumber fruit number, length or diameter.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviroe0
Outcome
number, length, diametere0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviro did not affect plant height at age of 10, 20, and 30 days after planting (DAP), the number, length, diameter and weight of cucumber fruits harvested for 4 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer interval did not affect cucumber fruit weight.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviroe0
Outcome
weight of cucumber fruitse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time interval of providing liquid organic fertilizer Enviro did not affect plant height at age of 10, 20, and 30 days after planting (DAP), the number, length, diameter and weight of cucumber fruits harvested for 4 times.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–981 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety significantly affected cucumber height at 10, 20 and 30 DAP.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
varietye0
Outcome
plant heighte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety exerted significant effects on plant height at age of 10, 20 and 30 DAP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety significantly affected cucumber fruit number, length and weight.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
varietye0
Outcome
number, length and weight of fruitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“variety exerted significant effects on plant height at age of 10, 20 and 30 DAP, the number, length and weight of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1121 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety did not significantly affect cucumber fruit diameter.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
varietye1
Outcome
fruit diametere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not exert a significant effect on fruit diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the other hand, variety exerted significant effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hercules 56 had the best growth and fruit length.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Material
Hercules 56e0
Outcome
growth and length of cucumber fruitse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best growth and length of cucumber fruits were found on varieties Hercules 56”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1262 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Local varieties had the best fruit number, diameter and weight over four harvests.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
local varietiese0
Outcome
number, diameter and weight of fruitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number, diameter and weight of fruits of four Time harvest were found on local varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1362 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer interval and variety had no significant interaction for all measured variables.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
varietye0
Treatment
time intervale0
Outcome
all variables observede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant interaction between time interval and variety on all variables observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 245–274 · show in text ↑

fertilization · organism · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 179 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 179 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.