Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Corn Response to Enhanced‐Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers and Poultry Litter

K. R. Sistani; M. Jn-Baptiste; J. R. Simmons

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
25
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen is one of the most important and costly nutrient inputs for crop production. Farmers are looking for better management practice to enhance production and reduce environmental impact. A 3‐yr field study was established to examine corn ( Zea mays L.) grain yield and nutrient uptake resulting from application of 168 kg N ha −1 as urea (U), urea‐ammonium nitrate (UAN), ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ), poultry litter (PL), and similar rate of commercially available enhanced‐efficiency nitrogen fertilizers (EENF) as follow: polymer‐coated urea (ESN), SuperU, UAN + AgrotainPlus, and PL + AgrotainPlus in a no‐till corn production. Treatments were replicated four times in a completely randomized block design from 2009 to 2011. Aboveground plant biomass was harvested at physiological maturity each year to determine dry matter and nutrient uptake. Soil samples were taken three times per year to evaluate the status of the selected nutrients in soil. There was a significant increase in corn aboveground dry matter and grain yield with application of 168 kg N ha −1 compared with control treatment. There was no significant difference in corn grain yield or dry matter among the N sources. However, averaged across all N sources, corn grain yield (10.1 Mg ha −1 ) in 2009 was greater than grain yield (7.5 Mg ha −1 ) in 2010 and 2011, mainly due to higher rainfall and better distribution in 2009. Addition of AgrotainPlus to UAN and PL did not influence corn grain yield. Additional research is needed to evaluate EENFs under different climatic conditions and different management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased corn aboveground dry matter relative to control.

Treatment
application of 168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
corn aboveground dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant increase in corn aboveground dry matter and grain yield with application of 168 kg N ha −1 compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application increased corn grain yield relative to control.

Treatment
application of 168 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant increase in corn aboveground dry matter and grain yield with application of 168 kg N ha −1 compared with control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield did not differ significantly among nitrogen sources.

Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
N sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in corn grain yield or dry matter among the N sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn dry matter did not differ significantly among nitrogen sources.

Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
N sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference in corn grain yield or dry matter among the N sources.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1197 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across nitrogen sources, corn grain yield was higher in 2009 than in 2010 and 2011.

Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
greater thane0
Value
10.1 Mg ha −1e0
Qualifier
7.5 Mg ha −1e0
Comparator
2010 and 2011e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“averaged across all N sources, corn grain yield (10.1 Mg ha −1 ) in 2009 was greater than grain yield (7.5 Mg ha −1 ) in 2010 and 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding AgrotainPlus to UAN did not influence corn grain yield.

Treatment
Addition of AgrotainPlus to UANe0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of AgrotainPlus to UAN and PL did not influence corn grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding AgrotainPlus to poultry litter did not influence corn grain yield.

Treatment
AgrotainPlus to UAN and PLe0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of AgrotainPlus to UAN and PL did not influence corn grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1480 · show in text ↑

urea ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Subsurface UAN injection produced higher corn grain yields than surface-applied fertilizers.

    Placement of Nitrogen Fertilizers for No‐Till and Conventional Till Corn1 · 1982 · compared with applying UAN, NH 4 NO 3 or urea directly on the soil‐residue surface

    Opposite direction

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

748 papers: 619 positive, 129 negative or no effect

618 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

744 papers more in this group

See all 748 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.