Paper · 2011 · Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America

Response of bioinoculents on growth, yield and fiber quality of cotton under irrigation

D. Dhale; S. Chatte

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani (M.S., India) to study the effect of bioinoculents on cotton. A co-cultured formulation of Azospirillum, Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and Pink coloured facultative methylotrops (PPFM) were used as bioinoculants in cotton var. PH-348. Plant growth parameters (length, fresh and dry weight) of shoot and root, yield parameters (weight of bolls, number of bolls per plants, seed cotton yield) and fiber quality parameters (span length, uniformity ratio, micronair value, tenacity, EIG%, SFI) were determined. Inoculation of Azospirillum, PSB and PPFMs along with chemical fertilizers resulted in to the significant increase in growth and seed cotton yield parameters of irrigated cotton. The interaction effect due to fertilizer and inoculation were significant on all dates of observations. Surat strain of Azospirillum was proved superior at all fertilizer level. The superiority of Surat strain of Azospirillum + PSB + PPFM was evident at all the fertilizer level and was immediately followed by MAU strain of Azospirillumn + PSB + PPFM. The uses of bioinoculents are beneficial in improving the fiber quality up to some extent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azospirillum, PSB and PPFM inoculation with fertilizer significantly increased irrigated cotton growth parameters.

Treatment
Inoculation of Azospirillum, PSB and PPFMs along with chemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
PPFMse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Azospirillum, PSB and PPFMs along with chemical fertilizers resulted in to the significant increase in growth and seed cotton yield parameters of irrigated cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Azospirillum, PSB and PPFM inoculation with fertilizer significantly increased irrigated cotton seed yield parameters.

Treatment
Inoculation of Azospirillum, PSB and PPFMs along with chemical fertilizerse0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
seed cotton yield parameterse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
PPFMse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Azospirillum, PSB and PPFMs along with chemical fertilizers resulted in to the significant increase in growth and seed cotton yield parameters of irrigated cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–774 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and inoculation had a significant interaction across observation dates.

Treatment
fertilizer and inoculatione0
Outcome
interaction effecte0
Qualifier
all dates of observationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect due to fertilizer and inoculation were significant on all dates of observations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Surat strain of Azospirillum was superior at all fertilizer levels.

Treatment
Surat strain of Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
all fertilizer levele0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surat strain of Azospirillum was proved superior at all fertilizer level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surat Azospirillum with PSB and PPFM was superior at all fertilizer levels.

Treatment
Surat strain of Azospirillum + PSB + PPFMe0
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
superioritye0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
MAU strain of Azospirillumn + PSB + PPFMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The superiority of Surat strain of Azospirillum + PSB + PPFM was evident at all the fertilizer level and was immediately followed by MAU strain of Azospirillumn + PSB + PPFM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinoculants somewhat improved cotton fiber quality.

Treatment
bioinoculentse0
Outcome
fiber qualitye0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
up to some extente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uses of bioinoculents are beneficial in improving the fiber quality up to some extent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azospirillum · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 61 positive, 12 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 95 positive, 9 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

100 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.