Paper · 1979 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture

Replacing a nitrophilous weed association with Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa on non-arable land

MH Campbell; WJ McDonald

11
claims
66
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association (broadleafed plants, annual grasses and native perennial grasses) were measured. Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa. Successful treatments were: 2,2-DPA + amitrole, 2,2-DPA + 2,4-D, paraquat + diquat and glyphosate. Intervals of 7 and 28 days between spraying and sowing had no differential effect on establishment. Sowing in late autumn resulted in successful establishment of all species. Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%. The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%. The experiment demonstrated that a nitrophilous weed association can be replaced with perennial pasture species on non-arable land on the Central Tablelands by using aerial techniques. Further research is needed to determine the optimum time of spraying and sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment of resident species was necessary for M. sativa establishment and development.

Treatment
Herbicide treatment of the resident speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Interactor
resident speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
establishment and developmente0t0e1e2e3e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment was necessary for P. aquatica establishment and development.

Treatment
Herbicide treatment of the resident speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Interactor
resident speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
establishment and developmente0t0e1e2e3e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris aquatica
Phalaris aquatica · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

V. dasycarpa established without herbicide treatment.

Outcome
establishment of V. dasycarpae0t0e1e2e3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia villosa subsp. varia
Vicia villosa subsp. varia · Taxon · picture of the speciesNo machine-readable author provided. Fabelfroh assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four herbicide treatments succeeded in establishing sown species.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae0t0e1e2e3e4
Treatment
2,2-DPA + amitrole, 2,2-DPA + 2,4-D, paraquat + diquat and glyphosatee0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
Successful treatmentse0t0e1e2e3e4
Direction
Successfule0t0e1e2e3e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Successful treatments were: 2,2-DPA + amitrole, 2,2-DPA + 2,4-D, paraquat + diquat and glyphosate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven and 28 day spray-to-sow intervals had no differential effect on establishment.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae0t0e1e2e3e4
Treatment
7e0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
establishmente0t0e1e2e3e4
Direction
no differential effecte0t0e1e2e3e4
Comparator
28 dayse0t0e1e2e3e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intervals of 7 and 28 days between spraying and sowing had no differential effect on establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late autumn sowing established all species successfully.

Taxon
Medicago sativaMedicago sativae0t0e1e2e3e4
Treatment
Sowing in late autumne0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
successful establishmente0t0e1e2e3e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing in late autumn resulted in successful establishment of all species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–866 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sown species ground cover under herbicides rose to 49% by late 1978.

Taxon
sown speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
percentage ground covere0t0e1e2e3e4
Direction
increasede0t0e1e2e3e4
Value
49%e0t0e1e2e3e4
Comparator
0% in early 1974e0t0e1e2e3e4

Verbatim

e0

“percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sown species ground cover in controls rose to 12%.

Taxon
sown speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
ground covere0t0e1e2e3e4
Direction
rosee0t0e1e2e3e4
Value
12%e0t0e1e2e3e4

Verbatim

e0

“control treatment rose from 0% to 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed ground cover under herbicides decreased to 27%.

Taxon
sown speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Treatment
herbicide treatmentse0t0e1e2e3e4
Interactor
nitrophilous weed associatione0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed associatione0t0e1e2e3e4
Direction
decreasede0t0e1e2e3e4
Value
27%e0t0e1e2e3e4
Comparator
76% in 1974e0t0e1e2e3e4

Verbatim

e0

“percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed ground cover in control decreased to 68%.

Taxon
sown speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
ground cover of the nitrophilous weed associatione0t0e1e2e3e4
Direction
felle0t0e1e2e3e4
Value
68%e0t0e1e2e3e4

Verbatim

e0

“control fell from 76% to 68%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerial techniques can replace weed association with perennial pasture on non-arable land.

Taxon
perennial pasture speciese0t0e1e2e3e4
Outcome
nitrophilous weed association can be replacede0t0e1e2e3e4
Setting
Central Tablelandse0t0e1e2e3e4

Verbatim

e0

“a nitrophilous weed association can be replaced with perennial pasture species on non-arable land on the Central Tablelands by using aerial techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phalaris aquatica and Medicago sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“Herbicide treatment of the resident species was necessary for the establishment and development of M. sativa and P. aquatica but not for the establishment of V. dasycarpa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–593 · show in text ↑
e2

“In an experiment (1974 to 1978) carried out on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales, the effects of nine herbicide treatments, two intervals between spraying and sowing, and sowing in late autumn, on the ability of Medicago sativa, Phalaris aquatica and Vicia dasycarpa to establish, develop and replace a nitrophilous weed association”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–340 · show in text ↑
e3

“Over four years the percentage ground cover of sown species on the herbicide treatments increased from 0% in early 1974 to 49% in late 1978; the control treatment rose from 0% to 12%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1051 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percentage ground cover of the nitrophilous weed association on the herbicide treatments decreased from 76% in 1974 to 27% in 1978; the control fell from 76% to 68%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1221 · show in text ↑

sowing time · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 7 positive, 4 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

herbicide · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

herbicide · growth · Phalaris aquatica (canary grass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.