Paper · 1961 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis and Several Chemical Insecticides for Control of Budworms and Hornworms on Tobacco

C. S. Creighton; W. S. Kinard; Norman Allen

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a field experiment conducted at Florence, S. C., in 1960, a commercial Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner spore material containing 93 × 109 spores per gram gave good control of the tobacco hornworm (Protoparce sexta (Johannson)) and the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens (F.)) on tobacco. Hand applications of the spore material, either undiluted or in a cornmeal bait, to the terminal buds gave as good or better control than sprays containing Thiodan® (6,7,8,9,10, 10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9,-methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin-3-oxide), endrin, or Shell SD-4402 (1,3,4,5,6, 7,8,8-octachloro-8a,4, 7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-methanophthalan), but caused injury to tender foliage. A bacillus suspension spray was less phytotoxic and equal to the chemical insecticides in protecting the plants from the caterpillars. Combinations of the bacillus and either SD-4402 or Thiodan were usually no better than the bacillus alone.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis spore material gave good control of tobacco hornworm.

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner spore materiale0
Interactor
Protoparce sexta (Johannson)e0pest
Outcome
control of the tobacco hornworme0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“a commercial Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner spore material containing 93 × 109 spores per gram gave good control of the tobacco hornworm (Protoparce sexta (Johannson)) and the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens (F.)) on tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus thuringiensis spore material gave good control of tobacco budworm.

Treatment
Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner spore materiale0
Interactor
Heliothis virescens (F.)Heliothis virescense0pest
Outcome
the tobacco budworme0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Heliothis virescens
Heliothis virescens · Interactorxpda · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“a commercial Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner spore material containing 93 × 109 spores per gram gave good control of the tobacco hornworm (Protoparce sexta (Johannson)) and the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens (F.)) on tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 61–291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand applications of spore material controlled caterpillars as well as or better than chemical sprays.

Treatment
Hand applications of the spore materiale0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
as good or bettere0
Comparator
sprays containing Thiodan®e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hand applications of the spore material, either undiluted or in a cornmeal bait, to the terminal buds gave as good or better control than sprays containing Thiodan® (6,7,8,9,10, 10-hexachloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a-hexahydro-6,9,-methano-2,4,3-benzodioxathiepin-3-oxide), endrin, or Shell SD-4402 (1,3,4,5,6, 7,8,8-octachloro-8a,4, 7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7-methanophthalan)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–652 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand application of spore material injured tender tobacco foliage.

Outcome
injury to tender foliagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“but caused injury to tender foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A bacillus suspension spray was less phytotoxic.

Treatment
bacillus suspension spraye0
Outcome
phytotoxice0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
chemical insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“A bacillus suspension spray was less phytotoxic and equal to the chemical insecticides in protecting the plants from the caterpillars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacillus suspension spray protected plants from caterpillars as well as chemical insecticides.

Treatment
bacillus suspension spraye0
Interactor
caterpillarse0pest
Outcome
protecting the plants from the caterpillarse0
Direction
equale0
Comparator
chemical insecticidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“A bacillus suspension spray was less phytotoxic and equal to the chemical insecticides in protecting the plants from the caterpillars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining bacillus with SD-4402 or Thiodan usually did not improve on bacillus alone.

Treatment
Combinations of the bacillus and either SD-4402 or Thiodane0
Outcome
no bettere0
Direction
no bettere0
Comparator
bacillus alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–122 · show in text ↑
e0

“Combinations of the bacillus and either SD-4402 or Thiodan were usually no better than the bacillus alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 826–931 · show in text ↑

Bacillus thuringiensis · Heliothis virescens · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · crop injury · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

application · pest · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.