Abstract
Stored wheat that was infested by each of 3 species of mites, Lepidoglyphus destructor (Schrank), Acarus farris (Oudemans), and Aëroglyphus robustus Banks, was studied to determine the effects of mites on the quality of wheat. L. destructor infestation of the grain led to significantly lower fat acidity values (P<0.01) and significantly slower loss of seed germination (P<0.05) than in the noninfested wheat. Seed moisture content, infection by fungi (Aspergillus candidus Link and Alternaria alternate (Fr.) Keissler) and bacteria, and the electrical conductivity of wheat-steeped water were unaffected by the presence of the mites.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
L. destructor infestation of stored wheat led to significantly lower fat acidity values than in noninfested wheat
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- L. destructor infestatione2
- Interactor
- L. destructorLepidoglyphus destructore2pest
- Outcome
- fat acidity valuese2
- Direction
- lowere2
- Comparator
- noninfested wheate2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Stored wheat that was infested by each of 3 species of mites”
e2“L. destructor infestation of the grain led to significantly lower fat acidity values (P<0.01) and significantly slower loss of seed germination (P<0.05) than in the noninfested wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
L. destructor infestation of stored wheat led to significantly slower loss of seed germination than in noninfested wheat
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- L. destructor infestatione2
- Interactor
- L. destructorLepidoglyphus destructore2pest
- Outcome
- loss of seed germinatione2
- Direction
- slowere2
- Comparator
- noninfested wheate2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Stored wheat that was infested by each of 3 species of mites”
e2“L. destructor infestation of the grain led to significantly lower fat acidity values (P<0.01) and significantly slower loss of seed germination (P<0.05) than in the noninfested wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Mite presence left seed moisture content and fungal and bacterial infection of stored wheat unaffected
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- presence of the mitese3
- Interactor
- Aspergillus candidus
Aspergillus candiduse3pathogen - Second interactor
- Alternaria alternatee3pathogen
- Outcome
- Seed moisture content, infection by fungi (Aspergillus candidus Link and Alternaria alternate (Fr.) Keissler) and bacteriae3
- Direction
- unaffectede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Stored wheat that was infested by each of 3 species of mites”
e3“Seed moisture content, infection by fungi (Aspergillus candidus Link and Alternaria alternate (Fr.) Keissler) and bacteria, and the electrical conductivity of wheat-steeped water were unaffected by the presence of the mites”
Claim · model-written summary
Mite presence left the electrical conductivity of wheat-steeped water unaffected
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- presence of the mitese3
- Outcome
- the electrical conductivity of wheat-steeped watere3
- Direction
- unaffectede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Stored wheat that was infested by each of 3 species of mites”
e3“Seed moisture content, infection by fungi (Aspergillus candidus Link and Alternaria alternate (Fr.) Keissler) and bacteria, and the electrical conductivity of wheat-steeped water were unaffected by the presence of the mites”
The same questions in other papers
infection · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →infection · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.