Paper · 2016 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Studies on the Control of Ascochyta Blight in Field Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Caused by Ascochyta pinodes in Zhejiang Province, China

Na Liu; Shengchun Xu; Xiefeng Yao; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Ascochyta blight, an infection caused by a complex of Ascochyta pinodes, Ascochyta pinodella, Ascochyta pisi, and/or Phoma koolunga, is a destructive disease in many field peas (Pisum sativum L.)-growing regions, and it causes significant losses in grain yield. To understand the composition of fungi associated with this disease in Zhejiang Province, China, a total of 65 single-pycnidiospore fungal isolates were obtained from diseased pea samples collected from 5 locations in this region. These isolates were identified as Ascochyta pinodes by molecular techniques and their morphological and physiological characteristics. The mycelia of ZJ-1 could penetrate pea leaves across the stomas, and formed specific penetration structures and directly pierced leaves. The resistance level of 23 available pea cultivars was tested against their representative isolate A. pinodes ZJ-1 using the excised leaf-assay technique. The ZJ-1 mycelia could penetrate the leaves of all tested cultivars, and they developed typical symptoms, which suggested that all tested cultivars were susceptible to the fungus. Chemical fungicides and biological control agents were screened for management of this disease, and their efficacies were further determined. Most of the tested fungicides (11 out of 14) showed high activity toward ZJ-1 with EC50 < 5 μg/mL. Moreover, fungicides, including tebuconazole, boscalid, iprodione, carbendazim, and fludioxonil, displayed more than 80% disease control efficacy under the recorded conditions. Three biocontrol strains of Bacillus sp. and one of Pantoea agglomerans were isolated from pea-related niches and significantly reduced the severity of disease under greenhouse and field conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first study on ascochyta blight in field peas, and results presented here will be useful for controlling the disease in this area.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All 65 diseased pea isolates were identified as Ascochyta pinodes.

Taxon
field pease2
Interactor
Ascochyta pinodesDidymella pinodese1pathogen
Outcome
identified as Ascochyta pinodese1
Value
65e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Didymella pinodes
Didymella pinodes · InteractorWheelwalker · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a total of 65 single-pycnidiospore fungal isolates were obtained from diseased pea samples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–449 · show in text ↑
e1

“These isolates were identified as Ascochyta pinodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–544 · show in text ↑
e2

“field peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZJ-1 mycelia penetrated pea leaves through stomata and directly with penetration structures.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Interactor
ZJ-1e0pathogen
Outcome
penetrate pea leaves across the stomas, and formed specific penetration structures and directly pierced leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mycelia of ZJ-1 could penetrate pea leaves across the stomas, and formed specific penetration structures and directly pierced leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–765 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All 23 tested pea cultivars were susceptible to A. pinodes ZJ-1.

Material
23 available pea cultivarse1
Interactor
A. pinodes ZJ-1Didymella pinodese1pathogen
Outcome
susceptiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Didymella pinodes
Didymella pinodes · InteractorWheelwalker · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all tested cultivars were susceptible to the fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1099 · show in text ↑
e1

“The resistance level of 23 available pea cultivars was tested against their representative isolate A. pinodes ZJ-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–880 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eleven of 14 tested fungicides had high activity toward ZJ-1.

Interactor
ZJ-1e0pathogen
Outcome
high activity toward ZJ-1e0
Value
11 out of 14e0
Qualifier
EC50 < 5 μg/mLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the tested fungicides (11 out of 14) showed high activity toward ZJ-1 with EC50 < 5 μg/mL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“pea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five named fungicides each achieved over 80% disease control.

Taxon
field pease1
Treatment
tebuconazole, boscalid, iprodione, carbendazim, and fludioxonile0
Outcome
disease control efficacye0
Direction
more thane0
Value
more than 80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fungicides, including tebuconazole, boscalid, iprodione, carbendazim, and fludioxonil, displayed more than 80% disease control efficacy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1487 · show in text ↑
e1

“field peas (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus biocontrol strains significantly reduced disease severity.

Treatment
Three biocontrol strains of Bacillus sp.e0
Interactor
Bacillus sp.e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
severity of diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three biocontrol strains of Bacillus sp. and one of Pantoea agglomerans were isolated from pea-related niches and significantly reduced the severity of disease under greenhouse and field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pantoea agglomerans significantly reduced disease severity.

Treatment
Pantoea agglomeranse0
Interactor
Pantoea agglomeransPantoea agglomeranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
severity of diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhouse and field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pantoea agglomerans
Pantoea agglomerans · InteractorDr. Sahay · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three biocontrol strains of Bacillus sp. and one of Pantoea agglomerans were isolated from pea-related niches and significantly reduced the severity of disease under greenhouse and field conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1717 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · control · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biocontrol · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.