Paper · 2010 · Acta Horticulturae

EFFECTS OF THE PLANT GROWTH REGULATOR "STIMULATETM" ON SOME POSTHARVEST QUALITIES OF TOMATO GROWN IN TROPICAL GREENHOUSE

S. Steen; N. Benkeblia; J. Cohen

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different concentrations of an exogenous plant growth regulator (Stimulate™, a commercial product consisting of a mixture of auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin), on some post harvest quality attributes of 'Albaron' tomato fruits, grown in greenhouses. Foliar applications of Stimulate™ were made every fourteen days. After harvesting, fresh and dry mass, diameter and colour per tomato fruit were assessed. The dry mass were 5.23, 5.68, 5.26 and 5.35 g/100 g fresh mass, the diameters were 6.06, 5.72, 6.35 and 6.24 cm, respectively for control (water) and increasing concentrations: 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml for each GA and IBA, with corresponding 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 μg/ml of kinetin. No significant differences were observed. The rate of colour change from red orange to red was faster for the treated (7 days) compared to the control (9 days) plants. A positive correlation was observed for diameter and fruit mass. These results suggested that the exogenous application of the plant growth regulator Stimulate™ had no effect on the size of the fruits, but hastened colour changes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stimulate treatments did not significantly change tomato fruit dry mass.

Treatment
increasing concentrations: 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml for each GA and IBA, with corresponding 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 μg/ml of kinetine0
Outcome
dry masse0
Value
5.23, 5.68, 5.26 and 5.35 g/100 g fresh masse0
Comparator
control (water)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry mass were 5.23, 5.68, 5.26 and 5.35 g/100 g fresh mass, the diameters were 6.06, 5.72, 6.35 and 6.24 cm, respectively for control (water) and increasing concentrations: 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml for each GA and IBA, with corresponding 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 μg/ml of kinetin. No significant differences were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stimulate treatments did not significantly change tomato fruit diameter.

Treatment
increasing concentrations: 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml for each GA and IBA, with corresponding 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 μg/ml of kinetine0
Outcome
diameterse0
Value
6.06, 5.72, 6.35 and 6.24 cme0
Comparator
control (water)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the diameters were 6.06, 5.72, 6.35 and 6.24 cm, respectively for control (water) and increasing concentrations: 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 μg/ml for each GA and IBA, with corresponding 0.9, 1.8 and 3.6 μg/ml of kinetin. No significant differences were observed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stimulate treatment accelerated tomato fruit colour change from red orange to red: 7 versus 9 days.

Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
rate of colour change from red orange to rede0
Direction
fastere0
Value
7 dayse0
Qualifier
9 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of colour change from red orange to red was faster for the treated (7 days) compared to the control (9 days) plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato fruit diameter and mass were positively correlated.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
diameter and fruit masse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation was observed for diameter and fruit mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–91 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

87 papers: 80 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

kinetin · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.