Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation

Responses of Vitis vinifera ‘Pinot gris’ Grapevines to Exogenous Abscisic Acid (ABA): I. Yield, Fruit Quality, Dormancy, and Freezing Tolerance

Shouxin Li; Imed E. Dami

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
29
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Economic losses due to cold weather events are a major constraint to the expansion of premium but cold-sensitive winegrape cultivars in colder regions, such as Ohio (USDA) Plant Hardiness Zones 6b–5b (−17.8 to −26.1 °C) (ARS-USDA 2012). The purpose of this study was to determine whether a foliar application of abscisic acid (ABA) could increase the freezing tolerance (FT) of field-grown ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines ( Vitis vinifera ), and whether the effectiveness of ABA treatments can be influenced by the phenological timing of the application. Mature ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines were treated with a foliar application of ABA at a concentration of 0 mg L −1 (control), or 400 mg L −1 at vine phenological stages corresponding to véraison, post-véraison, and postharvest. ABA application did not affect yield components, fruit composition, or vegetative growth, but caused early leaf senescence, leaf abscission, and advanced dormancy that led to increased FT of ‘Pinot gris’ during the dormant season. The phenological timing of application influenced ABA effectiveness, with spray applications made at véraison and post-véraison being the most effective. It was concluded that a foliar application of ABA increased bud FT during the dormant season, and thus, ABA is a potential cultural practice tool for mitigating economic losses from cold injury in production regions with damaging cold events.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA did not affect yield components, fruit composition or vegetative growth of Pinot gris grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
foliar application of ABAe1
Outcome
yield components, fruit composition, or vegetative growthe2
Direction
did not affecte2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field-grown ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines ( Vitis vinifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mature ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines were treated with a foliar application of ABA at a concentration of 0 mg L −1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–665 · show in text ↑
e2

“ABA application did not affect yield components, fruit composition, or vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA caused early leaf senescence, leaf abscission and advanced dormancy in Pinot gris grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
foliar application of ABAe1
Outcome
early leaf senescence, leaf abscission, and advanced dormancye3
Direction
increasee3
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field-grown ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines ( Vitis vinifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mature ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines were treated with a foliar application of ABA at a concentration of 0 mg L −1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–665 · show in text ↑
e3

“caused early leaf senescence, leaf abscission, and advanced dormancy that led to increased FT of ‘Pinot gris’ during the dormant season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA increased bud freezing tolerance of Pinot gris grapevines during the dormant season.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
foliar application of ABAe1
Outcome
FTe3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field-grown ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines ( Vitis vinifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–432 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mature ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines were treated with a foliar application of ABA at a concentration of 0 mg L −1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–665 · show in text ↑
e3

“caused early leaf senescence, leaf abscission, and advanced dormancy that led to increased FT of ‘Pinot gris’ during the dormant season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray applications at véraison and post-véraison were the most effective timing of ABA for freezing tolerance.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
spray applications made at véraison and post-véraisone4
Outcome
ABA effectivenesse4
Direction
most effectivee4
Comparator
postharveste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field-grown ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines ( Vitis vinifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–432 · show in text ↑
e4

“The phenological timing of application influenced ABA effectiveness, with spray applications made at véraison and post-véraison being the most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1152 · show in text ↑
e5

“at vine phenological stages corresponding to véraison, post-véraison, and postharvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–767 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ABA is a potential cultural practice tool for mitigating economic losses from cold injury in grapevine production.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Outcome
potential cultural practice tool for mitigating economic losses from cold injurye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“field-grown ‘Pinot gris’ grapevines ( Vitis vinifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–432 · show in text ↑
e6

“ABA is a potential cultural practice tool for mitigating economic losses from cold injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1347 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · tolerance: abiotic · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · tolerance: abiotic · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.