Paper · 2012 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Foliar Application of Abscisic Acid Increases Freezing Tolerance of Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines

Yi Zhang; Imed E. Dami

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop a method to increase freezing tolerance of field-grown grapevines using foliar application of abscisic acid (ABA). The specific objectives were to evaluate the morphological and physiological changes of field-grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc grapevines in response to exogenous ABA application and to determine an optimum timing for foliar application of ABA that results in enhanced freezing tolerance. Cabernet franc grapevines grown at two locations were treated with 400 and 600 mg/L ABA at different stages of development corresponding to veraison and 20, 30, 40, and 55 days postveraison. ABA did not affect yield components or basic fruit chemical composition. However, it enhanced anthocyanin concentration, advanced dormancy, decreased bud water content, and ultimately increased freezing tolerance under simulated freezing events. The increased freezing tolerance by ABA was confirmed by assessing bud injury following natural freezing events of −19°C and −23°C in two locations. The effectiveness of ABA may have been enhanced by application timing, which was optimum at veraison and 20 to 30 days postveraison. Results suggest that ABA application has the capacity to enhance dormancy and increase freezing tolerance and can be used as a prophylactic tool to protect against winter injury of grape cultivars grown in cold regions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA did not affect yield components or basic fruit chemical composition of grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
ABAe1
Outcome
yield components or basic fruit chemical compositione1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“ABA did not affect yield components or basic fruit chemical composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA enhanced anthocyanin concentration in grapevine fruit.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
400 and 600 mg/L ABAe0
Outcome
anthocyanin concentratione2
Direction
enhancede2
Setting
two locationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cabernet franc grapevines grown at two locations were treated with 400 and 600 mg/L ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“it enhanced anthocyanin concentration, advanced dormancy, decreased bud water content, and ultimately increased freezing tolerance under simulated freezing events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA advanced dormancy of grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
400 and 600 mg/L ABAe0
Outcome
dormancye2
Direction
advancede2
Setting
two locationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cabernet franc grapevines grown at two locations were treated with 400 and 600 mg/L ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“it enhanced anthocyanin concentration, advanced dormancy, decreased bud water content, and ultimately increased freezing tolerance under simulated freezing events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA decreased bud water content of grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
400 and 600 mg/L ABAe0
Outcome
bud water contente2
Direction
decreasede2
Setting
two locationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cabernet franc grapevines grown at two locations were treated with 400 and 600 mg/L ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“it enhanced anthocyanin concentration, advanced dormancy, decreased bud water content, and ultimately increased freezing tolerance under simulated freezing events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA increased freezing tolerance of grapevines under simulated freezing events.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
400 and 600 mg/L ABAe0
Outcome
freezing tolerancee2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
under simulated freezing eventse2
Setting
two locationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cabernet franc grapevines grown at two locations were treated with 400 and 600 mg/L ABA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–535 · show in text ↑
e2

“it enhanced anthocyanin concentration, advanced dormancy, decreased bud water content, and ultimately increased freezing tolerance under simulated freezing events”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar ABA increased freezing tolerance of grapevines after natural freezing events of −19°C and −23°C, assessed by bud injury.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
ABAe3
Outcome
freezing tolerancee3
Direction
increasede3
Value
−19°C and −23°Ce3
Qualifier
assessing bud injurye3
Setting
two locationse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“The increased freezing tolerance by ABA was confirmed by assessing bud injury following natural freezing events of −19°C and −23°C in two locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1032 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing at veraison and 20 to 30 days postveraison may have enhanced the effectiveness of ABA on grapevines.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
application timinge4
Outcome
effectiveness of ABAe4
Direction
enhancede4
Qualifier
optimum at veraison and 20 to 30 days postveraisone4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effectiveness of ABA may have been enhanced by application timing, which was optimum at veraison and 20 to 30 days postveraison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1165 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

ABA application can be used as a prophylactic tool to protect grapevines against winter injury in cold regions.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
ABA applicatione5
Outcome
prophylactic tool to protect against winter injurye5
Setting
cold regionse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field-Grown Vitis vinifera Cabernet franc Grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“Results suggest that ABA application has the capacity to enhance dormancy and increase freezing tolerance and can be used as a prophylactic tool to protect against winter injury of grape cultivars grown in cold regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1385 · show in text ↑

(+)-abscisic acid · tolerance: abiotic · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · quality: general · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.