Paper · 2013 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Effect of long-term fym application with fertilizers on productivity of finger millet

Savita; G.N. Dhanapal; Satish Verma

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Integrated nutrient management (INM) treatments viz., FYM @ 10 t/ha + 100% Recommended dose of NPK recorded higher grain yield (3200 kg ha−1) as compared to application of NPK alone (2055 kg ha−1). The INM treatment (FYM+ Rec. NPK) with mono-cropping recorded higher Sustainability Yield Index (0.70) followed by with rotation over 9 years (0.55). Application of FYM significantly increased the organic carbon status of the soil. Its application with NPK significantly increased organic carbon, available NPK, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 t/ha plus 100% recommended NPK gave higher finger millet grain yield (3200 kg ha-1) than NPK alone (2055 kg ha-1).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
FYM @ 10 t/ha + 100% Recommended dose of NPKe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3200 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
2055 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
NPK alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FYM @ 10 t/ha + 100% Recommended dose of NPK recorded higher grain yield (3200 kg ha−1) as compared to application of NPK alone (2055 kg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–200 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The INM treatment (FYM plus recommended NPK) with mono-cropping had a higher Sustainability Yield Index (0.70) than with rotation (0.55) over 9 years.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
INM treatment (FYM+ Rec. NPK) with mono-croppinge0
Outcome
Sustainability Yield Indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.70e0
Qualifier
0.55e0
Comparator
rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The INM treatment (FYM+ Rec. NPK) with mono-cropping recorded higher Sustainability Yield Index (0.70) followed by with rotation over 9 years (0.55)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM application significantly increased the organic carbon status of the soil.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Application of FYMe0
Outcome
organic carbon status of the soile0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM significantly increased the organic carbon status of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–432 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM application with NPK significantly increased soil organic carbon and available NPK.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Application of FYMe0
Outcome
organic carbon, available NPKe1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
application with NPKe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its application with NPK significantly increased organic carbon, available NPK, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM application with NPK significantly increased soil Ca, Mg and S.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Application of FYMe0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, Se1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
application with NPKe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its application with NPK significantly increased organic carbon, available NPK, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM application with NPK significantly increased soil micronutrients.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Application of FYMe0
Outcome
micronutrientse1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
application with NPKe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–370 · show in text ↑
e1

“Its application with NPK significantly increased organic carbon, available NPK, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–554 · show in text ↑
t0

“finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–85 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

rotation · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.