Paper · 2016 · Journal of Crop Improvement

Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Effects on the Growth and Yield of Maize in a Dry Agro-Ecology in Northern Ghana

R. A. L. Kanton; P. V. V. Prasad; A. M. Mohammed; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Declining maize (Zea mays L.) yields caused by factors, such as inherently poor soils, continuous cropping of cereal after cereal, high cost and unavailability of chemical fertilizers, continuous crop-residue removal, and soil erosion and run-off, have all contributed to low soil fertility and reduced maize yields in northern Ghana. To address this negative trend, a three-year field trial was conducted at the Manga Agricultural Research Station in the Upper East Region of Ghana, which represents a Sudan Savannah agro-ecology. The treatments comprised 11 available sources of organic and inorganic fertilizers, which are soil fertility management practices used by peasant farmers. A randomized complete block design with four replications was used. The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers. Poultry manure and sheep manure were the best among the organic sources evaluated. Whereas most of the fertility management options accrued net benefits of more than $150.00, the goat droppings and town waste had low net benefits of $44.30 and $17.00, respectively, indicating low gains on investment and therefore, not profitable for field application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave taller plants than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
taller plantse0
Direction
tallere0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave earlier tasseling and silking than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
earlier tasseling and silkinge0
Direction
earliere0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave higher grain yields than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
higher grain yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave increased straw yields than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
increased straw yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave plant height than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave stem girth than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
stem girthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave grain size than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
grain sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient-containing inorganic fertilizers gave harvest indices than organic fertilizers in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrientse0
Outcome
harvest indicese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
organic fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the inorganic fertilizers with micro-nutrients, such as S, Zn, and Mg, (i.e., Actyva and 21:10:10:2 S) produced taller plants, caused earlier tasseling and silking, and produced higher grain yields on account of increased straw yields, plant height, stem girth, grain size, and harvest indices than organic fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure and sheep manure ranked best among evaluated organic fertilizer sources for maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Poultry manure and sheep manuree0
Outcome
best among the organic sources evaluatede0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poultry manure and sheep manure were the best among the organic sources evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

goat droppings returned a low net benefit of $44.30 in maize production.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
goat droppingse0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
$44.30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the goat droppings and town waste had low net benefits of $44.30 and $17.00, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

town waste returned a low net benefit of $17.00 in maize production.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
town wastee0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
lowe0
Value
$17.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the goat droppings and town waste had low net benefits of $44.30 and $17.00, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most fertility management options accrued net benefits over $150.00 in maize production.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
fertility management optionse0
Outcome
net benefitse0
Direction
more thane0
Value
$150.00e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of the fertility management options accrued net benefits of more than $150.00”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider goat droppings and town waste unprofitable for field application.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
goat droppings and town wastee0
Outcome
not profitable for field applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the goat droppings and town waste had low net benefits of $44.30 and $17.00, respectively, indicating low gains on investment and therefore, not profitable for field application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 45 positive, 4 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.