Paper · 2011

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT NUTRITION SYSTEMS (ORGANIC, CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND INTEGRATED) AND FUNGI PIRIFORMOSPORA INDICA ON YIELD AND CONCENTRATION OF ELEMENTS IN SHOOT AND GRAIN OF FENNEL (FOENICULUM VALGARE MILL)

Jamshidi Ehsan; A Ghalavand; Sephidkon Fatemeh; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The aims of our study were to compare the effectiveness of different nutrition systems and fungi Piriformospora indica on yield and the concentration of elements in shoot and grain of fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill). A field study was conducted in 2009 in the Tehran region and the type of design was a randomized complete block with a factorial arrangement and three replications. Five levels of manure (without organic manure, 100% cattle manure, 100% spent mushroom compost and 50% cattle manure with 50% spent mushroom compost and 100% N) along with two levels of inoculation and notinoculation of the plant with Piriformospora indica. Results showed that different nutrition systems impacted significantly on yield, dry matter, harvest index and nitrogen concentration of plant and grain. The result also showed that fungi significantly affected all of the measured traits except for the potassium concentration of plant and grain. Also, the interaction effects of fungi × nutrition systems was not significant in all measured traits except the harvest index. The result showed that the highest (1559 kg/ha) and the least (632 kg/ha) grain yield was produced in chemical systems Piriformospora indica and fertilization systems respectively

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrition systems significantly affected yield, dry matter and harvest index.

Treatment
different nutrition systemse0
Outcome
yield, dry matter, harvest indexe0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“different nutrition systems impacted significantly on yield, dry matter, harvest index and nitrogen concentration of plant and grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrition systems significantly affected plant and grain nitrogen concentration.

Treatment
different nutrition systemse0
Outcome
nitrogen concentration of plant and graine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different nutrition systems impacted significantly on yield, dry matter, harvest index and nitrogen concentration of plant and grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“FENNEL (FOENICULUM VALGARE MILL)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 179–211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus significantly affected measured traits except potassium concentration.

Treatment
fungie0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae2symbiont
Outcome
all of the measured traitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungi significantly affected all of the measured traits except for the potassium concentration of plant and grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–937 · show in text ↑
e1

“fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“fungi Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus did not significantly affect potassium concentration.

Treatment
Piriformospora indicae2
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae2symbiont
Outcome
potassium concentration of plant and graine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except for the potassium concentration of plant and grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–936 · show in text ↑
e1

“fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“fungi Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus and nutrition interaction was significant for harvest index.

Treatment
nutrition systemse0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae2symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effects of fungi × nutrition systems was not significant in all measured traits except the harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“fungi Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungus and nutrition interaction was nonsignificant for other measured traits.

Treatment
nutrition systemse0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae2symbiont
Outcome
all measured traits except the harvest indexe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“interaction effects of fungi × nutrition systems was not significant in all measured traits except the harvest index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1065 · show in text ↑
e1

“fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–216 · show in text ↑
e2

“fungi Piriformospora indica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical system with Piriformospora produced maximum grain yield of 1559 kg/ha.

Treatment
chemical systems Piriformospora indicae0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1559 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest (1559 kg/ha) and the least (632 kg/ha) grain yield was produced in chemical systems Piriformospora indica and fertilization systems respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization systems produced minimum grain yield of 632 kg/ha.

Treatment
fertilization systemse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
leaste0
Value
632 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest (1559 kg/ha) and the least (632 kg/ha) grain yield was produced in chemical systems Piriformospora indica and fertilization systems respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1245 · show in text ↑
e1

“fennel (Foeniculum Valgare Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–216 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Anethum foeniculum (fennel)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 51 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.